Qualitative inquiry and the politics of evidence
What is evidence in qualitative inquiry and how is it evaluated? What is true or false in research is strongly influenced by socially defined criteria and by the politics of academia. In providing an alternative to conservative science, qualitative researchers are often victimized by these politics. The use of qualitative evidence within the policy arena is also subject to social and political factors. Within qualitative inquiry itself, evidence is defined differently in different discoursesalaw, medicine, history, cultural, or performance studies. The interdisciplinary, international group of contributors to this volume address these questions in an attempt to create evidential criteria for qualitative work. Sponsored by the International Center for Qualitative Inquiry.
この書籍の 10 ページで Ghana が見つかりました
検索結果1-3 / 10
レビュー - レビューを書く
他の版 - すべて表示
academic activists AERA Altheide analysis approach argued asked assessment autoethnography called Carolyn causal causal explanation context criteria critical Critical pedagogy critical realism critique cultural discourse discussion educational research elephant empirical epistemic epistemic communities epistemological ethics ethnography evaluation evidence-based evidentiary narrative experience feminist Ghana Giardina going institutional review boards International interpretive interview Iran Iraq issues Kincheloe knowledge Leah Leah's methodology N. K. Denzin Nick paradigms participants performance perspective philosophy policymakers politics of evidence positivism practice qualitative inquiry qualitative methods qualitative research Qualitative Studies quantitative questions RCTs realism relationship Research Assessment Exercise research in education researcher's response rigor risk Sage schools scientific shrines social research social science standards Stronach systematic reviewing talk theory things Thousand Oaks tion tive tradition Trokosi understanding University Press women workshop writing Y. S. Lincoln York