The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of EvilOxford University Press, 2002/09/12 - 304 ページ What distinguishes evils from ordinary wrongs? Is hatred a necessarily evil? Are some evils unforgivable? Are there evils we should tolerate? What can make evils hard to recognize? Are evils inevitable? How can we best respond to and live with evils? Claudia Card offers a secular theory of evil that responds to these questions and more. Evils, according to her theory, have two fundamental components. One component is reasonably foreseeable intolerable harm -- harm that makes a life indecent and impossible or that makes a death indecent. The other component is culpable wrongdoing. Atrocities, such as genocides, slavery, war rape, torture, and severe child abuse, are Cards paradigms because in them these key elements are writ large. Atrocities deserve more attention than secular philosophers have so far paid them. They are distinguished from ordinary wrongs not by the psychological states of evildoers but by the seriousness of the harm that is done. Evildoers need not be sadistic:they may simply be negligent or unscrupulous in pursuing their goals. Cards theory represents a compromise between classic utilitarian and stoic alternatives (including Kants theory of radical evil). Utilitarians tend to reduce evils to their harms; Stoics tend to reduce evils to the wickedness of perpetrators: Card accepts neither reduction. She also responds to Nietzsches challenges about the worth of the concept of evil, and she uses her theory to argue that evils are more important than merely unjust inequalities. She applies the theory in explorations of war rape and violence against intimates. She also takes up what Primo Levi called the gray zone, where victims become complicit in perpetrating on others evils that threaten to engulf themselves. While most past accounts of evil have focused on perpetrators, Card begins instead from the position of the victims, but then considers more generally how to respond to -- and live with -- evils, as victims, as perpetrators, and as those who have become both. |
この書籍内から
検索結果1-5 / 31
9 ページ
... identification with victims. The terms ”victims" and "perpetrators” mislead, however, if they suggest that individuals are simply one or the other, if either. For it is not unusual for victims of some evils (perhaps as a result) to ...
... identification with victims. The terms ”victims" and "perpetrators” mislead, however, if they suggest that individuals are simply one or the other, if either. For it is not unusual for victims of some evils (perhaps as a result) to ...
14 ページ
... identification with victims' positions, the atrocity paradigm encourages us to consider the impact on victims of making comparisons. This consideration argues against gratuitously ranking atrocities, out of respect for all victims. One ...
... identification with victims' positions, the atrocity paradigm encourages us to consider the impact on victims of making comparisons. This consideration argues against gratuitously ranking atrocities, out of respect for all victims. One ...
18 ページ
... be multiple perpetrators and multiple victims in what is commonly identified as a single evil, such as a mass murder. But can one person be both perpetrator and victim? I tend to characterize evils 18 The Atrocity Paradigm.
... be multiple perpetrators and multiple victims in what is commonly identified as a single evil, such as a mass murder. But can one person be both perpetrator and victim? I tend to characterize evils 18 The Atrocity Paradigm.
34 ページ
書籍の閲覧制限を超えています.
書籍の閲覧制限を超えています.
35 ページ
書籍の閲覧制限を超えています.
書籍の閲覧制限を超えています.
目次
3 | |
2 Nietzsches Denial of Evil | 27 |
Two Extremes | 50 |
4 Kants Theory of Radical Evil | 73 |
5 Prioritizing Evils over Unjust Inequalities | 96 |
6 Rape in War | 118 |
7 Terrorism in the Home | 139 |
8 The Moral Powers of Victims | 166 |
9 The Moral Burdens and Obligations of Perpetrators | 188 |
Diabolical Evil Revisited | 211 |
Notes | 235 |
Index | 265 |
他の版 - すべて表示
多く使われている語句
abuse argues atrocity paradigm basic benefits better Cambridge Categorical Imperative chapter choices comfort women concept of evil conflicts crimes culpable wrongdoing death deeds defined definition diabolical evil difficult Essays ethics evildoers example feminism feminist find first forgiveness Genealogy Genealogy of Morality gratitude gray zone guilt hatred hostility human identified inequalities inflicted intolerable harm John Rawls justified Kant Kant’s lesbian less lives marriage Martha Nussbaum Mary Daly mercy misogyny moral Moral Luck motherhood mothers motives murder Nietzsche Nietzsche's Nussbaum obligation offender ofjustice one’s oppression penalty perpetrators perspectives philosophers practices principle prioritize prisoners punishment question radical evil rape Rawls Rawls’s reflection regarding relationships resentment response same-sex sense sexual sexual slavery significant simply slavery slaves social Sonderkommando specific spouses Stockholm Syndrome stoic stoicism suffering survivors terrorism theory of evil things tion torture trans University Press utilitarian values victims violence Wiesenthal Wiesenthal’s women wrong York