ページの画像
PDF
ePub

derstanding, that inward sense of our Maker's goodness to us, which even now is delightful, beyond the conception of those, who have not experienced it; and shall hereafter be so heightened, as vastly to exceed the present conceptions of the best of us; may keep our hearts and minds*, our judgments and affections, in the knowledge and love of God and his Christ: and that every blessing of the holy Trinity may be distributed amongst us, and remain with us always. Grant this, O heavenly Father, for the sake, &c.

[blocks in formation]

SERMON XXX.

1 PET. V. 12.

Exhorting and testifying that this is the true grace of God wherein ye stand.

THE happiness of all creatures depends intirely on their obedience to his will whose sovereign power created and rules the world. Now the will of God is made known to us in part by natural reason: and they who have no other law shall be judged by that alone. But as reason was unable to teach mankind a great number of things very important to be known, and in fact, did teach most of them but a small part of what it might have done; God was mercifully pleased to superadd the light of Revelation to it, and place us under the conduct of both jointly. Such an additional provision, it might have been hoped, had cleared up all doubts; but partly the weakness, partly the wickedness of men, hath turned even this light into darkness, and made it multiply disputes instead of ending them. Still we have no reason to be discouraged; for every upright and considerate person may after all, with due care, very easily see his way before him, clearly enough to walk in it. But we have great reason to use this care, and make such enquiry amidst the different paths, which different persons point out to us, as will give us cause to be satisfied we chuse the right. Now of all the different opinions which have risen concerning the Christian religion, there have been few so remarkable as that which divides this part of the world into Popish and

Protestant. Those of the former communion, it seems, think us of the latter quite out of the way to salvation, and accordingly are unwearied in persuading, as they have opportunity, the members of our Church, especially the lower and more ignorant part of them, to quit it for theirs. The necessity of doing this, they insist upon sometimes with so much plausibility, and always with so much confidence, that I hope you will not think a few discourses ill employed on a subject of such very great importance both to our private satisfaction and public security, in refuting the arguments they usually bring against us, and testifying that this is the true grace of God, wherein ye stand. To proceed regularly in this matter, I shall

I. Enquire what is the rule of Christian faith and life: and

II. Examine by this rule the peculiar doctrines and practices of the Romish Church.

I. I shall enquire what is the rule of Christian faith and life: from whence we are to learn what things our religion requires as necessary, and what it forbids as unlawful: for, if we do the one and avoid the other, we are undoubtedly safe. Now as Jesus Christ is the sole author of our faith*, those things, and those alone, which he taught himself, and commissioned his Disciples to teach, are parts of our faith. What his doctrine was we find in no less than four accounts of his life and preaching given in the Gospels. To what belief his disciples converted men, we find in the Acts. What they taught men after their conversion, we read in the Epistles. These several Books, which make up the New Testament, all Christians allow to contain an original and

* Heb. xii. 2.

$

undoubtedly true account of our religion. The only possible question is, whether they contain a full and clear account. Now such a one they without question intended to give, for what could induce them designedly to give any other? Besides, St. Luke, in the very beginning of his Gospel, tells us, that having a perfect understanding of those things which were believed amongst Christians, he had taken in hand to set forth a declaration of them, that those he wrote to might know the certainty of what they had been instructed in. And St. John, in the conclusion of his, tells us, that though our Saviour did, and doubtless said also, many things that were not written in that book, yet these, says he, are written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might have life through his name *. This being then their intention, can we possibly think they failed of it? Two of the Evangelists at least were constantly present at our Saviour's discourses, the other two heard them either from him, or his immediate followers, and they had the promise of his Spirit to bring all things to their remembrance whatsoever he had said unto them. they after all forget any part of this that was material and necessary? That any of them should do so is very strange: much more that they all should. That St. Luke, the companion of the Apostles, and the writer of their Acts, that he too, in relating what they taught their converts, should unhappily omit any thing essential, still adds to the wonder: and that no one of the many Epistles written to instruct the Churches in their faith and duty, should supply this defect, is beyond all belief. But supposing the Scripture

John xx. 30, 31.

Could

ever so perfect in

† John xiv. 26.

itself, yet the Church of Rome objects that it is not clear to us even to the learned many things are hard to be understood; which therefore to the unlearned must be impossible. Nay sometimes they tell us not one sentence of it hath a meaning, which by our own private judgment we can be certain of. But surely the Apostles were not worse writers with a divine assistance, than others commonly are without it. What they spoke and preached was plain; else they spoke to no purpose: and why should not the same things be as plain when they were written down? Some passages indeed might to some persons be difficult, even at first: and more are doubtless become so by length of time. But that the main of the New Testament is intelligible enough cannot be with any modesty denied. And for the rest, what at first sight is difficult, may with due consideration of our own, and help of others, be made easy; what is obscurely expressed in one place, may be clearly expressed in another; and what is clearly expressed in no place, we may safely for that very reason conclude it is not neccessary for us to understand or believe.

But allowing the Scriptures to have been at first sufficiently intelligible, how do we know they are come down to us uncorrupted? I answer, by all the same arguments which prove the incorruptness of any other ancient book in the world, and by this argument farther, that these books having many more copies of them, being much wider dispersed and much more carefully read, and warmly disputed about, than any other whatever it is in proportion more incredible that either chance or design should alter them in any thing considerable without discovery from some quarter, even were no particular Providence to watch over writings so worthy of its

« 前へ次へ »