Socrates, Lucretius, Camus: Two Philosophical Traditions on DeathEdwin Mellen Press, 2001 - 519 ページ The present essay attempts to do something that has not been done in the recent literature concerning death, namely, to link reasons for attitudes towards death to reasons for different metaphysical postions on human being and the place of human being in the universe. Most recent discussions of death either place the topic directly in the context of nothing more than ethical considerations continued on the next page. |
目次
Where Death Is I Am Not Lucretius | 29 |
Overcoming Death Socrates and His Successors | 77 |
The Epicurean Reply Hume | 167 |
著作権 | |
他の 9 セクションは表示されていません
多く使われている語句
absolute values absurd accept achieve actions activity Albert Camus argument Aristotle attitude towards death Baier belief body Camus causal causes cognitive concerning contrary course craving Dasein David Hume defended desire Emma entities Epicurean Epicurus Epicurus and Lucretius essay eternal Ethics existence fact fact of death fear of death feel Forms grasp Heidegger hope human nature Hume's Humean idea immortality inevitable innate justified Klemke knowledge Kurt Baier Lucretius Maecenas matter meaning metaphysical Meursault mind monist moral Myth of Sisyphus Nagel narrator neo-Platonic novel objective value one's oneself ontology ordinary ourselves pain passions patterns person Phaedo philosophical Plato pleasure Plotinus Plutarch possible rational reason recognize regret religion Samuel Johnson sceptic Seneca sense experience Simmias simply social society Socrates sort soul Spinoza standard Stoics striving suicide super-ego task of living things thought trans transcendent truth understand unified unity University Press virtue virtuous world of sense