ページの画像
PDF
ePub

Kingdoms are clay: our dungy earth alike
Feeds beast as man: the nobleness of life
Is, to do thus; when such a mutual pair, · [Embracing.
And such a twain can do 't, in which, I bind
On pain of punishment, the world to weet,
We stand up peerless.
Cleo.

Excellent falsehood!
Why did he marry Fulvia, and not love her?-
I'll seem the fool I am not; Antony
Will be himself.
Ant.

But stirr'd by Cleopatra.

of raising triumphal arches to perpetuate their victories, Extremely noble. Warburton.

I am in doubt whether Shakspeare had any idea but of a fabric standing on pillars. The later editions have all printed the raised empire, for the ranged empire, as it was first given.

Fohnson. The rang’d empire is certainly right. Shakspeare uses the same expression in Coriolanus :

bury all which yet distinctly ranges, “In heaps and piles of ruin.” Again, in Much Ado about Nothing, Act II, sc. ii : “Whatsoever comes ath wart his affection, ranges evenly with mine.” Steevens.

The term range seems to have been applied, in a peculiar sense, to mason-work, in our author's time. So, in Spenser's Fairy Queen, B. II, c. ix:

* It was a vault y-built for great dispence,

“ With many raunges rear'd along the wall.” Malone. What, in ancient masons' or bricklayers' work, was denominated a range, is now called a course. Steevens.

to weet,] To know. Pope.

Antony
Will be himself.

Ant. But stirr'd by Cleopatra.] But, in this passage, seems to have the old Saxon signification of without, unless, except. Antony, says the queen, will recollect his thoughts. Unless kept, he replies, in commotion by Cleopatra. Johnson.

What could Cleopatra mean by saying Antony will recollect his thoughts? What thoughts were they, for the recollection of which she was to applaud him ? It was not for her purpose that he should think, or rouse himself from the lethargy in which she wished to keep him. By Antony will be himself, she means to say, “that Antony will act like the joint sovereign of the world, and follow his own inclinations, without regard to the mandates of Cæsar, or the anger of Fulvia.” To which he replies, If but stirr'd by Cleopatra ; that is, if moved to it, in the slightest degree by her. M. Mason.

5

6

Now, for the love of Love, and her soft hours,?
Let 's not confound the times with conference harsh:
There 's not a minute of our lives should stretch
Without some pleasure now: What sport to-night?

Cleo. Hear the ambassadors.
Ant.

Fy wrangling queen!
Whom every thing becomes, to chide, to laugh,
To weep;1 whose every passion fully strives2
To make itself, in thee, fair and admir'd!
No messenger; but thine and all alone,3
To-night, we 'll wander through the streets,4 and note

? Now, for the love of Love, and her soft hours,] For the love of Love, means, for the sake of the queen of love. So, in The Comedy of Errors :

" Let Love, being light, be drowned if she sink.” Mr. Rowe substituted his for her, and this unjustifiable alteration was adopted by all the subsequent editors. Malone.

8 Let's not confound the time – ] i. e. let us not consume the time. So, in Coriolanus :

“ How could'st thou in a mile confound an hour,

“ And bring thy news so late?Malone. 9 Whom every thing becomes,] Quicquid enim dicit, seu facit, omne decet.”

Marullus, Lib. II. Steevens. 1 Whom every thing becomes, to chide, to laugh, To weep; ] So, in our author's 150th Sonnet: “ Whence hast thou this becoming of things'ill,

“ That in the very refuse of thy deeds
“There is such strength and warrantise of skill,

“ That in my mind thy worst all best exceeds ?" Malone. 2 whose every passion fully strives —] So, in The Tempest :

whose
every

cubit
“Seems to cry out,” &c.
See Vol. II, p. 60. Again, in Cymbeline, Act I, sc. vii:

this hand, whose touch, Whose every touch" &c. The same expression occurs again in another play, but I have lost my reference to it. Steevens.

3 No messenger ; but thine and all alone, &c.] Cleopatra has said, “Call in the messengers ;” and afterwards, “ Hear the ambassadors.” Talk not to me, says Antony, of messengers; I am now wholly thine, and you and I unattended will to-night wander through the streets. The subsequent words which he utters as he goes out, Speak not to us,” confirm this interpretation.

Malone. To-night, we'll wander through the streets, &c.] So, in Sir Thomas North's translation of The Life of Antonius : -Some.

" A space,

[ocr errors]

4

The qualities of people. Come, my queen;
Last night you did desire it :-Speak not to us.

[Exeunt Ant. and Cleo. with their Train. Dem. Is Cæsar with Antonius priz'd so slight?

Phi. Sir, sometimes, when he is not Antony, He comes too short of that great property Which still should go with Antony.

Dem. That he approves the common liar,5 who Thus speaks of him at Rome: But I will hope Of better deeds to-morrow. Rest you happy! [Exeunt.

I'm full sorry,

SCENE II.

The same. Another Room.

Enter CHARMIAN, IRAS, ALEXAS, and a Soothsayer.

Char. Lord Alexas, sweet Alexas, most any thing Alexas, almost absolute Alexas, where 's the soothsayer that you praised so to the queen? O, that I knew

time also when he would goe up and downe the citie disguised like a slave in the night, and would peere into poore mens' windowes and their shops, and scold and brawl with them within the house ; Cleopatra would be also in a chamber maides array, and amble up and down the streets with him,” &c. Steevens.

5 That he approves the common liar,] Fame. That he proves the common liar, fame, in his case to be a true reporter. Malone. So, in Hamlet : “Не

may approve our eyes, and speak to it.” Steevens. 6 Enter Charmian, Iras, Alexas, and a Soothsayer.] The old copy reads: "Enter Enobarbus, Lamprius, a Soothsayer, Rannius, Lucilius, Charmian, Iras, Mardian the Eunuch, and Alexas.” Plutarch mentions his grandfather Lamprias, as his author for some of the stories he relates of the profuseness and luxury of Antony's entertainments at Alexandria. Shakspeare appears to have been very anxious in this play to introduce every incident and every personage he met with in his historian. In the multitude of his characters, however, Lamprias is entirely overlooked, together with the others whose names we find in this stagedirection.

It is not impossible, indeed, that Lamprias, Rannius, Lucilius, &c. might have been speakers in this scene as it was first written down by Shakspeare, who afterwards thought proper to omit their speeches, though at the same time he forgot to erase their names as originally announced at their collective entrance.

Steevens.

this husband, which, you say, must change his horns with garlands 16

6

man:

66

[ocr errors]

change his horns with garlands !] This is corrupt; the true reading evidently is :-must charge his horns with garlands, i. e. make him a rich and honourable cuckold, having his horns hung about with garlands. Warburton.

Sir Thomas Hanmer reads, not improbably, change for horns his garlands. I am in doubt, whether to change is not merely to dress, or to dress with changes of garlands. Johnson. So, Taylor, the water-poet, describing the habit of a coach

with a cloak of some pyed colour, with two or three change of laces about." Change of clothes, in the time of Shakspeare, signified variety of them. Coriolanus says that he has received change of honours” from the Patricians. Act II, sc. i.

That to change with, "applied to two things, one of which is to be put in the place of the other,” is the language of Shak. speare, Mr. Malone might have learned from the following passage in Cymbeline, Act I, sc. vi, i.e. the Queen's speech to Pisanio:

to shift his being, Is to exchange one misery with another.” Again, in the 4th Book of Milton's Paradise Lost, y. 892:

where thou might'st hope to change " Torment with ease.' Steevens. I once thought that these two words might have been often confounded, by their being both abbreviated, and written chāge. But an n, as the Bishop of Dromore observes to me, was some. times omitted both in MS. and print, and the omission thus marked, but an r never. This therefore might account for a compositor inadvertently printing charge instead of change, but not change instead of charge; which word was never abbreviated. I also doubted the phraseology-change with, and do not at present recollect any example of it in Shakspeare's plays or in his time; whilst in The Taming of the Shrew, we have the modern phraseology-change for :

To change true rules for odd inventions." But a careful revision of these plays has taught me to place no confidence in such observations; for from some book or other of the age, I have no doubt almost every combination of words that may be found in our author, however uncouth it may appear to our ears, or however different from modern phraseology, will at some time or other be justified. In the present edition, many which were considered as undoubtedly corrupt, have been incontrovertibly supported.

Still, however, I think, that the reading originally introduced by Mr. Theobald, and adopted by Dr. Warburton, is the true one, because it affords a clear sense; whilst, on the other hand, the reading of the old copy affords none: for supposing change with to mean exchange for, what idea is conveyed by this passage? and what other sense can these words bear? The substantive change being formerly used to signify variety, (as change VOL. XIII.

S

Alex. Soothsayer.
Sooth. Your will?
Char. Is this the man? Is 't you, sir, that know things?

Sooth. In nature 's infinite book of secrecy,
A little I can read.
Alex.

Show him your hand.

Enter ENOBARBUS. Eno. Bring in the banquet quickly; wine enough, Cleopatra's health to drink.

Char. Good sir, give me good fortune.

of clothes, of honours, &c.) proves nothing: change of clothes or linen necessarily imports more than one ; but the thing sought for is the meaning of the verb to change, and no proof is produced to show that it signified to dress; or that it had any other meaning than to exchange.

Charmian is talking of her future husband, who certainly could not change his horns, at present, for garlands, or any thing else, having not yet obtained them; nor could she mean, that when he did get them, he should change or part with them, for garlands: but he might charge his horns, when he should marry Charmian, with garlands: for having once got them, she intended, we may suppose, that he should wear them contentedly for life Horns charged with garlands, is an expression of a similar import with one which is found in Characterismi, or Lenton's Leasures, 8vo. 1631. In the description of a contented cuckold, he is said to “hold his velvet horns high as the best of them.”

Let it also be remembered that garlands are usually wreathed round the head; a circumstance which adds great support to the emendation now made. So, Sidney:

A garland made, on temples for to wear." It is observable that the same mistake as this happened in Coriolanus, where the same correction was made by Dr. Warburton, and adopted by all the subsequent editors :

“ And yet to charge thy sulphur with a bolt

“That should but rive an oak." The old copy there, as here, has change. Since this note was written, I have met with an example of the phrase-to change with, in Lyly's Maydes Metamorphosis, 1600 :

“ The sweetness of that banquet must forego,

“Whose pleasant taste is chang'd with bitter woe.” I am still, however, of opinion that charge, and not change, is the true reading, for the reasons assigned in my original note.

Malone. “ To change his horns with si. e. for] garlands," signifies, to be a triumphant cuckold; a cuckold who will consider his state as an honourable one. Thus, says Benedick, in Much Ado about Nothing: “There is no staff more honourable than one tipt with horn.We are not to look for serious argument in such a

skipping dialogue” as that before us. Steevens.

[ocr errors]
« 前へ次へ »