ir ac the cional, fent. resent dea of future ar na foun doc there En re es of one of the most effential without which they coul be approved or accepted many Christian teachers n expreffes it, among the MENTS. THE points in controv Calvinifts and the Armi what I have chiefly had tract; but there is anothe is admitted by perfons wh nifts, as well as by thofe v it may not be improper notice of, though it is n ture, urged i of the in fcript Chrift i he poffe Father; the Aln is life is thee, "Chrif of fpeal doctrine reconcil ver and one of ofoever It is ne c faith Ho keep DOUBT INGLY urged in its fupport. of the Deity appears cle in fcripture, in a great v Christ invariably spoke of he poffeffed as derived fr Father; and in one of hi the Almighty, our Lor is life eternal, that th "thee, THE ONLY TRUE "Chrift whom thou haft That we nd Tri ounding bftance. Father, of the Holy "then fhall the Son alfo himself be fubject "unto him that put all things under him, "that God may be all in all "7.” J THE abfurd and inconfiftent reprefentations, which have frequently been given of the Christian fyftem, by its mistaken friends, appear to have done it more real differvice, than all the writings of the Deifts. The oppofition of the Deifts has in fome refpects been very ferviceable to Christianity: it has occafioned the evidences of its divine origin to be more diligently inquired into, and more clearly pointed out. And it has fhewn, that the gofpel is fuperior to all the attacks of its keeneft adverfaries. But the abfurd notions, which have been propagated of the Christian religion, by many of its profeffors, have prevented it from having its proper effect upon many of those who did profefs a belief in 57 1 Cor. xv. 24, 25, 27, 28. |