ページの画像
PDF
ePub

little regard to their government. The Scots, in those ages, were often in open war, and never in cordial friendship with the English. The fimilarity of manners and language, the traditions concerning their common origin, and above all, their having to do with the fame enemy, created a free and friendly intercourfe between the Scottish and Irish nations. As the cuftom of retaining bards and fenachies was common to both; fo each, no doubt, had formed a system of hiftory, it matters not how much foever fabulous, concerning their refpective origin. It was the natural policy of the times, to reconcile the traditions of both nations together, and, if poffible, to reduce them from the fame original ftock.

THE Saxon manners and language had, at that time, made great progrefs in the fouth of Scotland. The ancient language, and the traditional history of the nation, became confined entirely to the inhabitants of the Highlands, then fallen, from feveral concurring circumstances, into the last degree of ignorance and barbarism. The Irish, who, for fome ages before the conqueft, had poffeffed a competent share of that kind of learning, which then prevailed in Europe, found it no difficult matter to impofe their own fictions on the ignorant Highland fenachies. By flattering the vanity of the Highlanders, with

6

[ocr errors]

their

their long lift of Heremonian kings and heroes, they, without contradiction, affumed to themselves the character of being the mother-nation of the Scots of Britain. At this time, certainly, was established that Hibernian fyftem of the original of the Scots, which afterwards, for want of any other, was univerfally received. The Scots of the low-country, who, by lofing the language of their ancestors, loft, together with it, their national traditions, received, implicitly, the history of their country, from Irish refugees, or from Highland fenachies, perfuaded over into the Hibernian system.

THESE circumftances are far from being ideal. We have remaining many particular traditions, which bear teftimony to a fact, of itself abundantly probable. What makes the matter inconteftible is, that the antient traditional accounts of the genuine origin of the Scots, have been handed down without interruption. Tho' a few ignorant fenachies might be persuaded out of their own opinion, by the smoothness of an Irish tale, it was impoffible to eradicate, from among the bulk of the people, their own national traditions. These traditions afterwards fo much prevailed, that the Highlanders continue totally unacquainted with the pretended Hibernian extract of the Scots nation. Ignorant chronicle writers,

Ꭲ 4

writers, ftrangers to the antient language of their country, preferved only from falling to the ground, fo improbable a ftory.

THIS fubject, perhaps, is purfued further than it deserves; but a difcuffion of the pretenfions of Ireland, was become in fome measure neceffary. If the Irish poems, concerning the Fiona, fhould appear ridiculous, it is but juftice to observe, that they are fcarcely more fo than the poems of other nations, at that period. On other fubjects, the bards of Ireland have difplayed a genius for poetry. It was, alone, in matters of antiquity, that they were monftrous in their fables. Their love-fonnets, and their elegies on the death of perfons worthy or renowned, abound with fimplicity, and a wild harmony of numbers. They become more than an atonement for their errors, in every other fpecies of poetry. But the beauty of these pieces, depends fo much on a certain curiofa felicitas of expreffion in the original, that they must appear much to disadvantage in another language.

A CRITICAL

DISSERTATION

ON THE

POEMS OF OSSIAN,

THE

SON OF FINGAL.

By HUGH BLAIR, D. D.

One of the Minifters of the High Church, and Profeffor of Rhetorick and Belles-Letters, in the University of

Edinburgh.

« 前へ次へ »