 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - 812 ページ
...whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interest of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1892 - 734 ページ
...order to be valid, must be only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection to the party in ftvor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. This is the principle which controlled the decision in Mandeville v. Harman,... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1893 - 690 ページ
...is only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection to the interest of the party in whose favor it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public." Brewer v. Marshall, 4 CE Or. 587. See, also, reference to other cases to same... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1837 - 988 ページ
...question, whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford & fair protection to the interests of the party in favour...as to interfere with the interests of the public. No certain precise boundary can be laid down, within which the restraint would be reasonable, and bevond... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1842 - 726 ページ
...Jac. 231. (4) 4 East, 130. (c) ~. Bing. 743. Dd 3 1841. applied to the question whether this is or not a reasonable restraint of trade, than by considering...larger than the necessary protection of the party [requires] can be of no benefit to either; it can only be oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1842 - 730 ページ
...190. (c) T £ing. 743. 1841. applied to the question whether this is or not a reasona^le restrain'; of trade, than by considering whether the restraint...larger than the necessary protection of the party [requires] can be of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in... | |
 | 1843 - 564 ページ
...reasonable. The words of Chief Justice Tiudal, in Homer v. Graves, (7 Bing. 743), may be safely adopted : ' We do not see how a better test can be applied to...larger than the necessary protection of the party (requires) can be of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1844 - 988 ページ
...rule thus: "We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question, whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether the restraint is such...as to interfere with the interests of the public. No certain precise boundary can be laid down, within which the restraint would be reasonable, and beyond... | |
 | 1849 - 734 ページ
...says : " We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question, whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether the restraint is such...interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever lestraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either ; it... | |
 | 1849 - 716 ページ
...afford a fair protection as to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given Î and is it not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public ? Per. CJ Tindall, in Homer vs. Graves, 7 Bing. 743. A restraint to greater extent than the necessary... | |
| |
We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether this is or not a reasonable restraint of trade than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom... 
