INTRODUCTION "I grant his household abstinence; I grant His neutral virtues, which most monarchs want; xiii " a kind master; a well-meaning, though unwise father; a faithful husband, possessing "that household virtue, most uncommon, Of constancy to a bad, ugly woman," which was the more creditable as his nature was vastly susceptible. He was pious, anxious to do his duty, and deeply attached to his country, but believing himself always in the right, was frequently led by his feelings into courses such as justified Byron's magnificent onslaught "In the first year of Freedom's second dawn A better farmer ne'er brushed dew from lawn, One half as mad, and t'other no less blind.” 1 Yet, notwithstanding all the mistakes George III made, and all the mischief he did, his reign ended in a blaze of glory. England had survived the French Revolution without disastrous effects; and had taken a leading part in the subjugation of Napoleon. Nelson and Wellington, Wordsworth and Keats, Fox and Pitt, reflected 1 The Vision of Judgment. their glory and the splendour of their actions upon the country of their birth. Yet-such is the irony of fate at its bitterest-while the world acknowledged the supremacy of England on land, at sea, and in commerce, while a whole people, delighted with magnificent achievements, acclaimed their ruler, crying lustily "God save the King," George, in whose name these great deeds were done, was but "a crazy old blind man in Windsor Tower." Give me a royal niche-it is my due, The virtuousest king the realm ever knew. I, through a decent reputable life, Was constant to plain food and a plain wife. Ireland I risked, and lost America; My brain, perhaps, might be a feeble part; When all the Kings were prostrate, I alone Nor ever could the ruthless Frenchman forge I let loose flaming Nelson on his fleets; But what boots victory by land and sea, 1 Thackeray: The Georges. CHAPTER I FREDERICK, PRINCE OF WALES HISTORIANS have found something to praise in George I, and the bravery of George II on the field of battle has prejudiced many in favour of that monarch. George III has been extolled for his domestic virtues, and his successor held up to admiration for his courtly manners, while William IV found favour in the eyes of many his homely air. Of all the Hanoverian princes in the direct line of succession to the English throne, alone Frederick Louis, Prince of Wales, lacks a solitary admirer among modern writers. for Frederick was born at Hanover on January 6, 1707, was there educated; and there, after the accession of George II to the English throne, remained, a mere lad, away from parental control, compelled to hold a daily Drawing-room, at which he received the adulation of unscrupulous and self-seeking courtiers in a dull, vulgar, and immoral Court. George II, remembering his behaviour to his father, was in no hurry to summon his son to England; and Frederick might have remained the ornament of the Hanoverian capital until Vol. 1-2-(2002) 1 |