Shakespeare and the Confines of Art

前表紙
Psychology Press, 2004 - 278 ページ

The fragmentation of Bengal and Assam in 1947 was a crucial moment in India's socio-political history as a nation state. Both the British Indian provinces were divided as much through the actions of the Muslim League as by those of Congress and the British colonial power. Attributing partition largely to Hindu communalists is, therefore, historically inaccurate and factually misleading. The Partition of Bengal and Assam provides a review of constitutional and party politics as well as of popular attitudes and perceptions. The primary aim of this book is to unravel the intricate socio-economic and political processes that led up to partition, as Hindus and Muslims competed ferociously for the new power and privileges to be conferred on them with independence. As shown in the book, well before they divorced at a political level, Hindus and Muslims had been cleaved apart by their socio-economic differences. Partition was probably inevitable.

 

ページのサンプル

目次

The Contrary Valuations page
1
The Sonnets to the Dark Woman
17
Loves Labours Lost
33
The Abandond Cave
49
Romeo and Juliet
71
Hamlet
83
The Problem Plays i
95
The Problem Plays ii
109
The Jacobean Tragedies
121
Last Plays
139
Conclusion
161
Notes
163
Index
168
著作権

他の版 - すべて表示

多く使われている語句

この書籍への参照

著者について (2004)

Bidyut Chakrabarty is Professor in Political Sciences and chair of Political Sciences at the University of Delhi, India.

書誌情報