Functional Constraints in Grammar: On the unergative unaccusative distinctionJohn Benjamins Publishing, 2004/09/30 - 242 ページ This book examines in detail the acceptability status of sentences in the following five English constructions, and elucidates the syntactic, semantic, and functional requirements that the constructions must satisfy in order to be appropriately used: There-Construction, (One s) Way Construction, Cognate Object Construction, Pseudo-Passive Construction, and Extraposition from Subject NPs. It has been argued in the frameworks of Chomskyan generative grammar, relational grammar, conceptual semantics and other syntactic theories that the acceptability of sentences in these constructions can be accounted for by the unergative unaccusative distinction of intransitive verbs. However, this book shows through a wide range of sentences that none of these constructions is sensitive to this distinction. For each construction, it shows that acceptability status is determined by a given sentence's semantic function as it interacts with syntactic constraints (which are independent of the unergative unaccusative distinction), and with functional constraints that apply to it in its discourse context. |
この書籍内から
検索結果1-5 / 61
vi ページ
... subject NPs and unaccusativity 169 6.1 Introduction 169 6.2 Johnson's (1985) analysis 170 6.3 Problems with Johnson's analysis 174 6.4 An alternative functional account 176 6.5 Extraposition of clauses from the subject NP 183 6.6 ...
... subject NPs and unaccusativity 169 6.1 Introduction 169 6.2 Johnson's (1985) analysis 170 6.3 Problems with Johnson's analysis 174 6.4 An alternative functional account 176 6.5 Extraposition of clauses from the subject NP 183 6.6 ...
ix ページ
... Subject-NP Construction. It shows that syntactic claims based on the unergative—unaccusative distinction of intransitive verbs that have been made by other scholars about these constructions do not hold. It further shows that for each ...
... Subject-NP Construction. It shows that syntactic claims based on the unergative—unaccusative distinction of intransitive verbs that have been made by other scholars about these constructions do not hold. It further shows that for each ...
11 ページ
... subject referent, as in the (a) examples below, while it is an unaccusative verb when it represents a nonvolitional ... NP, a theme/ patient is most commonly associated with the object NP; therefore, a theme subject originates in the ...
... subject referent, as in the (a) examples below, while it is an unaccusative verb when it represents a nonvolitional ... NP, a theme/ patient is most commonly associated with the object NP; therefore, a theme subject originates in the ...
13 ページ
... NP such as [NP many of them], meaning 'of them') can be clitic— ized from the (surface) subject of an unaccusative verb, but not from the subject of an unergative verb: (30) a. Ne of-them will arrive many arriveranno molti ...
... NP such as [NP many of them], meaning 'of them') can be clitic— ized from the (surface) subject of an unaccusative verb, but not from the subject of an unergative verb: (30) a. Ne of-them will arrive many arriveranno molti ...
19 ページ
... NP ska[ted bur[ned the house The subject the boy in (36a) takes the subject position (specifier position of IP) at both D- and S-structure, since the verb skated is unergative. The subject the house in (36b), on the other hand, takes ...
... NP ska[ted bur[ned the house The subject the boy in (36a) takes the subject position (specifier position of IP) at both D- and S-structure, since the verb skated is unergative. The subject the house in (36b), on the other hand, takes ...
目次
1 | |
31 | |
3 The way construction and unergativity | 67 |
4 The cognate object construction and unergativity | 105 |
5 The pseudopassive construction and unergativity | 137 |
6 Extraposition from subject NPs and unaccusativity | 169 |
7 Conclusion | 189 |
Notes | 199 |
References | 225 |
Name index | 235 |
Subject index | 239 |
The series Constructional Approaches to Language | 243 |
他の版 - すべて表示
多く使われている語句
acceptability results acceptability status apple Mary argued assign accusative assumed Babe Ruth Bruce Davison Burzio Chapter characterization claim cognate object construction Constraint in 45 Construction Grammar contrast D-structure danced definite denoting existence derived describe difficulty direct object ergative ergative verbs existence or appearance extraposed Extraposition from Subject fact find first floor following examples following sentences Functional Constraint Goldberg grin grizzly bear inside verbal interpretation intransitive Iohn Kuno laughed Levin and Rappaport logical subject Mary nonvolitional events nouns object NP Observe the following ofthe one’s passive sentences Perlmutter 1978 Perlmutter and Postal predicts preposition Pseudo-Passive Construction pseudo-passive sentences Rappaport Hovav 1995 Relational Grammar satisfies screamed Section sentence results sentences involving shown smile speaker specifier position subject NP subject position surface subject syntactic Takami there-construction there-sentences transitive verbs Unaccusative Restriction unaccusative verbs unergative and unaccusative Unergative Restriction unergative verbs unergative—unaccusative distinction unusual manner verbs can appear volitional actions