Is Inequality Bad for Our Health?
Goldthwaite Professor and Former Chair of the Tufts Philosophy Department and Professor of Medical Ethics at Tufts Medical School Norman Daniels, Norman Daniels, Bruce Kennedy, Ichirō Kawachi
Beacon Press, 2000 - 99 ページ
In this election year, health care again proves to be one of our nation's most urgent issues. Daniels, Kennedy, and Kawachi shift the focus of the debate, forcing us to take a closer look at how our health is affected by social injustice and inequality. Arguing that it isn't enough to increase access to doctors, they call for improving social conditions-such as poverty, lack of education and affordable housing, and harmful work environments-that damage our health. By urging us to work toward equality of opportunity for all, the authors situate health care reform among the larger social problems we must face.
The authors' argument for reform in early childhood development, nutrition, work environment, and distribution of income is certain to spark debate. The editor of The New England Journal of Medicine and World Health Organization officials respond.
Praise for the New Democracy Forum series: "The New Democracy Forum series is a civic treasure. . . . A truly good idea, carried out with intelligence and panache."—Robert Pinsky
NEW DEMOCRACY FORUM
A series of short paperback originals exploring creative solutions to our most urgent national concerns. The series editors (for Boston Review), Joshua Cohen and Joel Rogers, aim to foster politically engaged, intellectually honest, and morally serious debate about fundamental issues—both on and off the agenda of conventional politics.
レビュー - レビューを書く
achieve Americans analysis argue argument attention authors basic benefit better cause choice claim compared concerned connection countries Daniels determinants of health developed directly discussion distribution distribution of health early economic economic inequalities effects efforts empirical equal opportunity evidence example fact factors fair focus gradient greater groups health care health expectancy health inequalities health outcomes health status higher important improve income inequality individuals inequalities in health influence issue Kawachi Kennedy lead less liberties linked live lower matters measures ment mortality observed participation political poor population possible poverty primary principle problem produce programs public health question raise rates Rawls Rawls's Rawlsian reason redistribution reducing reform relationship relatively requires result rich risk seems social determinants social inequalities social justice society socioeconomic socioeconomic status status studies suggest tion United University