ページの画像
PDF
ePub

clad before the assembled army and populace of Syracuse. He then entered into an elaborate review of his past conduct, and concluded with offering to surrender his power into the hands of the people-a proposal which was of course rejected, and he was hailed by the acclamations of the multitude as their preserver and sovereign. (Diod. xi. 26; Polyaen. i. 27. § 1; Ael. V. H. vi. 11.) nours, having been carried off by a dropsy in B.C. 478, only two years after his victory at Himera, and seven from the commencement of his reign over Syracuse, (Diod. xi. 38; Arist. Pol. v. 9; Schol. ad Pind. Pyth. i. 89; Plut. de Pyth. Orac. p. 403.) It appears from Aristotle (Pol. v. 10; see also Schol. ad Pind. Nem. ix. 95) that he left an infant son, notwithstanding which, according to Diodorus, he on his deathbed appointed his brother Hieron to be his successor.

We know very little of the internal administration or personal character of Gelon: it is not unlikely that his brilliant success at Himera shed a lustre over his name which was extended to the

ctually preparing to join the allied armament to nave now thought himself sufficiently secure of hen he was prevented by the news of the Car- his power to make a show of resigning it, and achaginian invasion of Sicily (Herod. vii. 163-cordingly presented himself unarmed and thinly 65), and this appears to have been also the acount of the matter given by Ephorus (ap. Schol. d Pind. Pyth. i. 146). The expedition of the Carthaginians is attributed by the last-mentioned istorian (1. c.), as well as by Diodorus (xi. 1, 20), o an alliance concluded by them with Xerxes: Herodotus, with more probability, represents them s called in by Terillus, tyrant of Himera, who had been expelled from that city by Theron of Agri-He did not, however, long survive to enjoy his hogentum. The circumstances of their expedition re variously related, and may be suspected of much exaggeration (see Niebuhr, Lect. on Rom. Hist. vol. i. p. 105, ed. Schmitz), but the leading facts are unquestionable. The Carthaginian general Hamilcar arrived at Panormus with an army, as it 8 said, of 300,000 men, and advancing without opposition as far as Himera, laid siege to that place, which was, however, vigorously defended by Theron of Agrigentum. Gelon had previously formed an alliance and matrimonial connection with Theron, having married his daughter Demarete (Schol. ad Pind. Ol. ii. 1, 29): no sooner, therefore, did he hear of his danger than he advanced to his succour at the head of a force of 50,000 foot and 5000 horse. rest of his conduct also. But he is represented In the battle that ensued the Carthaginians were by late writers as a man of singular leniency and totally defeated, with a loss, as it is pretended, of moderation, and as seeking in every way to pro150,000 men, while nearly the whole of the re-mote the welfare of his subjects; and his name even mainder fell into the hands of the enemy as priBoners. Hamilcar himself was among the slain, and a few ships, which had made their escape with a number of fugitives on board, perished in a storm, so that scarcely a messenger returned to bear the disastrous news to Carthage. (Herod. vii. 165, 166; Diod. xi. 20-24; xiii. 59; Ephorus, ap. Schol.leged virtues, which would otherwise appear somePind. Pyth. i. 146; Polyaen. i. 27. § 2.) This victory was gained, according to the accounts reported by Herodotus, on the very same day as that of Salamis, while Diodorus asserts it to have been the same day with Thermopylae: the exact synchronism may in either case be erroneous, but the existence of such a belief so early as the time of Herodotus must be admitted as conclusive evidence of the expedition of the Carthaginians having been contemporary with that of Xerxes; hence the battle of Himera must have been fought in the autumn of 480 B.C. (Comp. Aristot. Poet. 23. §3.)

So great a victory naturally raised Gelon to the highest pitch of power and reputation: his friendship was courted even by those states of Sicily which had been before opposed to him, and, if we may believe the accounts transmitted to us, a solemn treaty of peace was concluded between him and the Carthaginians, by which the latter repaid him the expenses of the war. (Diod. xi. 26; Timaeus, ap. Schol. Pind. Pyth. ii. 3.) A stipulation is said by some writers to have been inserted that the Carthaginians should refrain for the future from human sacrifices, but there can be little doubt that this is a mere fiction of later times. (Theophrast. ap. Schol. Pind. l. c.; Plut. Apophth. p. 175, de ser. Num. vind. p. 552.) Gelon applied the large sums thus received, as well as the spoils taken in the war, to the erection of several splendid temples to adorn his favoured city, at the same time that he sent magnificent offerings to Delphi, and the other sanctuaries in Greece itself. (Diod. xi. 26; Paus. vi. 19. §7; Athen. vi. p. 231.) He seems

appears to have become almost proverbial as an instance of a good monarch. (Diod. xi. 38, 67, xiii. 22, xiv. 66; Plut. Dion. 5, de ser. Num. vind. p. 551.) He was, however, altogether illiterate (Ael. V. H. iv. 15); and perhaps this circumstance may account for the silence of Pindar concerning his al

what suspicious. But even if his good qualities as a ruler have been exaggerated, his popularity at the time of his death is attested by the splendid tomb erected to him by the Syracusans at the public expense, and by the heroic honours decreed to his memory. (Diod. xi. 38.) Nearly a century and a half afterwards, when Timoleon sought to extirpate as far as possible all records of the tyrants that had ruled in Sicily, the statue of Gelon alone was spared. (Plut. Timol. 23.)

Concerning the chronology of the reign of Gelon see Clinton (F. H. vol. ii. p. 266, &c.), Pausanias (vi. 9. § 4, 5, viii. 42. § 8), Dionysius (vii. 1), and Niebuhr (Rom. Hist. vol. ii. p. 97, note 201). The last writer adopts the date of the Parian chronicle, which he supposes to be taken from Timaeus, according to which Gelon did not begin to reign at Syracuse until B. C. 478; but it seems incredible that Herodotus should have been mistaken in a matter of such public notoriety as the contemporaneity of the battle of Himera with the expedition of Xerxes.

2. Son of Hieron II., king of Syracuse, who died before his father, at the age of more than 50 years. Very little is known concerning him, but he appears to have inherited the quiet and prudent character of Hieron himself; and it is justly recorded to his praise, by Polybius, that he sacrificed all objects of personal ambition to the duty of obedience and reverence to his parents. (Polyb. vii. 8.) It seems clear, however, that he was associated by Hieron with himself in the government, and that he even received the title of king. (Schweighäuser, ad Polyb. v. 88; Diod. Exc

Vales. xxvi. p. 568.) Livy asserts that after the battle of Cannae, Gelon was preparing to abandon the alliance of Rome for that of Carthage, and that he was only prevented from doing so by his sudden death; but this seems quite at variance with the statement of Polybius of his uniform submission to his father's views, and may very likely deserve as little credit as the insinuation with which Livy immediately follows it-that his death occurred so opportunely, as to cast suspicion upon Hieron himself. (Liv. xxiii. 30.) Gelon was married to Nereïs, daughter of Pyrrhus, by whom he left a son, Hieronymus, and a daughter, Harmonia, married to a Syracusan named Themistus. (Polyb. vii. 4 ; Justin. xxviii. 3; Paus. vi. 12. § 3.) Archimedes dedicated to him his treatise called Arenarius, in which it may be observed that he addresses him by the title of king. (Arenar. p. 319. ed Torell.)

The coins referred by earlier writers to the elder Gelon are generally admitted by modern numismatists to belong to this prince; the head on the obverse is probably that of Gelon himself; though Eckhel (vol. i. p. 255) considers it as that of the elder Gelon, and that the coins were struck in his honour, under the reign of Hieron II.

[ocr errors][merged small]

3. A native of Epeirus, in the service of Neoptolemus II., king of that country, who took occasion to form a plot against the life of Pyrrhus, when that prince and Neoptolemus had met to perform a solemn sacrifice. The conspiracy was, however, discovered, and Neoptolemus himself assassinated by his rival, B. c. 296. (Plut. Pyrrh. 5.) [E.H.B.] GELO'NUS. [ECHIDNA.]

GE'MINA, one of the ladies who attended the philosophical instructions of Plotinus when he was at Rome in the early part of the reign of the emperor Philip, A. D. 244. Her affluence is indicated by the circumstance that the philosopher resided and taught in her house, and her age by the circumstance that her daughter, of the same name with herself, was also one of his zealous disciples. (Porphyr. Vit. Plotin. c. 3, 9.) [J. C. M.]

GEMI'NIUS, 1. C. Praetor of Macedonia, B.C. 92. He sustained a severe defeat from the Maedians, a Thracian tribe, who afterwards ravaged the province. (Liv. Epit. 70; Jul. Obseq. de Prodig. 113.)

2. A decurio of Terracina, and a personal enemy of C. Marius the elder. The troop of horse which discovered Marius in the marshes of Minturnae, B. C. 88, had been despatched by Geminius to apprehend him. (Plut. Mar. 36, 38.)

3. A zealous partizan of M. Antony, was deputed by the triumvir's friends in Rome to remonstrate with him on his ruinous connection with Cleopatra. Geminius went to Athens in the winter of B. c. 32-31, but could not obtain a private audience from Antony. At length, being menaced by Cleopatra with the torture, he withdrew from Athens, leaving his mission unaccomplished. (Plut. Ant. 59.)

|

the

G

Octa te F us a

4. A Roman eques, put to death at the end who A. D. 33, on a charge of conspiracy against Tiberi but really because of his intimacy with Sejam badiy (Tac. Ann. vi. 14.) [W. B.D.] GEMI'NIUS METTIUS. [METTIUS.] GEMI'NUS (Teuvos). This name comes do to us in the manuscripts of Proclus, with a cumflex on the penultimate syllable. Gerard Ve sius believes, nevertheless, that it is the Latis part word: Petavius and Fabricius admit the circu but flex without other comment than reference to seve Proclus. Any one is justified in saying either first Gemīnus or Geminus, according to his theory.

(Di

Vib

Fu

unk

[ocr errors]

A. D

1.1.

G

!

Of the man belonging to this dubious name we per know nothing but that, from a passage in his works relative to the Egyptian annus vagus of 120 years before his own time, it appears that he must have been living in the year B. c. 77. He wa a Rhodian, and both Petavius and Vossius su pect that he wrote at Rome; but perhaps on m stronger foundation than his Latin name and his Greek tongue, which make them suppose that he was a libertus. Proclus mentions him (p. 11 of with Grynoeus) as distinguishing the mathematical the sciences into vonrá and aloenra, in the former o which he places geometry and arithmetic, in the latter mechanics, astronomy, optics, geodesy, cz. nonics, and logic (no doubt a corruption of logistic, was or computation; Barocius has ars supputatriz). and Again (p. 31) Proclus mentions him as author of a ha geometrical work containing an account of spiral, po conchoid, and cissoid lines. But Delambre (Astr. Anc. vol. i. p. 211) saw reason to question the skill of Geminus both in arithmetic and geometry.

The only work of Geminus now remaining is the Eloaywyn) eis rd Pavóμeva, which many wrongly make to be a commentary on the Phaenomens of Aratus. The work on the sphere attributed to Proclus is not much more than an abridgment of some chapters of Geminus. The book of the latter is a descriptive treatise on elementary astronomy, with a great deal of historical allusion. There is a full account of it in Delambre (l. c.). The total rejection of the supposed effects of the risings and settings of the stars, &c. upou the weather is creditable to Geminus. The work was first published by Edo Hildericus, Gr. Lat, Altorf, 1590, 8vo. This edition was reprinted at Leyden, 1603, 8vo. H. Briggs diligently compared the edition with a manuscript at Oxford, and handed the results to Petavius, who made a similar comparison with another manuscript of his own, and published a corrected edition (Gr. Lat.) in his Uranologion, Paris, 1630, fol. The most recent edition is that in Halma's edition of Ptolemy, Paris, 1819, 4to. Petavius also informs us that another work of Geminus was sent to England in manuscript, with other portions of the library of Barocius (the editor of Proclus, we presume). (Proclus; Fabric. Bibl. Graec. vol. iv. p. 31, &c.; Petavius, Uranologion; Weidler, Hist. Astron.; Delambre, Astron. Anc.) [A. De M.]

GE'MINUS, ANTONI'NUS, son of M. Aurelius and Faustina, twin brother of the emperor Commodus. He died when a child of four years old. [M. AURELIUS.] [W.R.]

GE MINUS, ATI'DIUS, a praetor of Achaia, but at what time is unknown. (Tac. Ann. iv. 43.) [L. S.] GE'MINUS, DUCE'NNIUS, was appointed by Nero, in A. D. 63, one of the three consulars

[ocr errors]

re

who had to superintend the public vectigalia and O prosecute those who had before managed them adly. In the reign of Galba he was praefect of the city. (Tac. Ann. xv. 18, Hist. i. 14.) [L. S.] GEMINUS, FU'FIUS. In B. C. 35, when Octavianus, after subduing the Pannonians, retired Rome, he left Fufius Geminus, with a part of us army, behind in Pannonia. Soon after the departure of Octavianus, the Pannonians rose again; put Geminus succeeded in compelling them, by everal battles, to remain quiet, although he had at irst been driven by them from the town of Siscia. Dion Cass. xlix. 36.) He seems to be the same person as the one whom Florus (iv. 12. § 8) calls Vibius. Whether he stood in any relation to C. Fufius Geminus, who was consul in A. D. 29, is unknown. (Tac. Ann. v. 1.)

[L. S.] GE'MINUS, L. RUBE'LLIUS, consul in A. D. 29, with C. Fufius Geminus. (Tac. Ann. 7. 1.) [L. S.] GE MINUS, SERVI'LIUS. 1. P. SERVILIUS, 2. F. CN. N. GEMINUS, was consul in B. c. 252, with C. Aurelius Cotta. Both consuls carried on the war in Sicily against the Carthaginians, and some towns were taken by them. Himera was among the number; but its inhabitants had been carried off by the Carthaginians. In B. c. 248 he was consul a second time, with his former colleague, and besieged Lilybaeum and Drepana, while Carthalo endeavoured to make a diversion by a descent upon the coast of Italy. (Zonar. viii. 14, 16.)

2. CN. SERVILIUS, P. F. Q. N. GEMINUS, a son of No. 1, was consul in B. c. 217, with C. Flaminius. He entered his office on the ides of March, and had Gaul for his province. He afterwards gave up his army to the dictator, Q. Fabius, and while his colleague fought the unfortunate battle of lake Trasimenus, Cn. Servilius sailed with a fleet of 120 ships round the coasts of Sardinia and Corsica in chase of the Carthaginians; and having received hostages everywhere, he crossed over into Africa. On his voyage thither he ravaged the island of Meninx, and spared Cercina only on the receipt of ten talents from its inhabitants. After he had landed with his troops in Africa, they indulged in the same system of plunder; but being careless and unacquainted with the localities, they were taken by surprise and put to flight by the inhabitants. About one thousand of them were killed, the rest sailed to Sicily, and the fleet being there entrusted to P. Sura, who was ordered to take it back to Rome, Cn. Servilius himself travelled on foot through Sicily; and being called back by the dictator, Q. Fabius Maximus, he crossed the straits, and went to Italy. About the autumn he undertook the command of the army of Minucius, and, in conjunction with his colleague M. Atilius Regulus, he carried on the war against Hannibal, though he carefully avoided entering into any decisive engagement. His imperium was prolonged for the year 216; and before the battle of Cannae he was the only one who agreed with the consul L. Aemilius Paullus in the opinion that a battle should not be ventured upon. However, the battle was fought, and Cn. Servilius himself was found among the dead. (Liv. xxi. 57, xxii. 1, 31, 32, 43, 49; Polyb. iii. 75, 77, 88, 96, 106, 114, 116; Appian, Annib. 8, 12, 16, 18, 19, 22 -24; Cic. Tusc. i. 37.)

3. M. SERVILIUS, C. F. P. N. PALEX GEMINUS, was elected augur in B. C. 211, in the

place of Spurius Carvilius, who had died; and in B. C. 203 he was curule aedile, and, conjointly with his colleague, he dedicated a golden quadriga on the Capitol. In the year same he was magister equitum to the dictator, P. Sulpicius Galba, with whom he travelled through Italy, to examine the causes which had led several towns to revolt against Rome. In B. c. 202 he was consul with Tib. Claudius Nero, and obtained Etruria for his province, which he occupied with his two legions, and in which his imperium was prolonged for the year following. In B. c. 200 he was one of the ten commissioners to distribute land in Samnium and Appulia among the veterans of Scipio. In B. C. 197 he was one of the triumvirs appointed for a period of three years, to establish a series of colonies on the western coast of Italy. In B. C. 167, during the disputes as to whether a triumph was to be granted to Aemilius Paullus, the conqueror of Macedonia, M. Servilius addressed the people in favour of Aemilius Paullus. (Liv. xxvi. 23, xxix. 38, xxx. 24, 26, 27, 41, xxxi. 4, xxxii. 29, xxxiv. 45, xlv. 36, &c.).

4. M. SERVILIUS GEMINUS was consul in A. D. 3, with L. Aelius Lamia (Val. Max. i. 8. § 11); but it must be observed that his cognomen, though mentioned by Valerius Maximus, does not occur in the Fasti. [L. S.]

GE'MINUS, TANU'SIUS, a Roman historian who seems to have lived about the time of Cicero. The exact nature of his work is uncertain, although we know that in it he spoke of the time of Sulla. (Suet. Caes. 9.) Plutarch (Caes. 22) mentions an historian whom he calls Tavúσios, and whom Vossius (de Hist. Lat. i. 12) considers to be the same as our Tanusius. Seneca (Epist. 93) speaks of one Tamusius as the author of annals; and it is not improbable that this is merely a slight mistake in the name, for Tanusius; and if this be 60, Tanusius Geminus wrote annals of his own time, which are lost with the exception of a fragment quoted by Suetonius. [L. S.]

GE'MINUS, TU'LLIUS, a poet of the Greek Anthology. There are ten epigrams in the Anthology under the name of Geminus (Brunck, Anal. vol. ii. p. 279; Jacobs, Anth. Graec. vol. ii. p. 254), of which the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and tenth are inscribed, in the Vatican MS. simply Teuívov, and the eighth Tatuívov: the first is inscribed, in the Planudean Anthology, Tuλlov Teuívov, and the seventh has the same heading in the Vatican MS: the 9th is inscribed, in the Planudean, Tuλlov Teuívov, and, in the Vatican, Tuλλíov Zabývov (i. e. Sabini). It is doubtful whether the Tullius, whose epigrams were included in the collection of Philip, was Tullius Geminus or Tullius Laurea. Most of the epigrams of Geminus are descriptions of works of art. They are written in a very affected manner. (Jacobs, Anth. Graec. vol. xiii. p. 897; Fabric. Bibl. Graec. vol. iv. p. 498.) [P.S.]

GE'MINUS, VETU'RIUS. [CICURINUS.] GEMISTUS, GEO'RGIUS (Γεώργιος ὁ Γεμι σrós), or GEO'RGIUS PLETHO (λńowv), one of the later and most celebrated Byzantine writers, lived in the latter part of the fourteenth and in the beginning of the fifteenth century. He was probably a native of Constantinople, but passed most of his life in the Peloponnesus. In 1426 he held a high office, under the emperor Manuel Palaeologus. He was called reμiστós, or Пλńowv, on

With a Latin translation, and Bessarion's eput on the same subject, by H. S. Reimarus, Leiden 1722, 8vo.

3. Περὶ ̓Αρετῶν, De Virtutibus. Editions:The text, together with some of the minor work of the author, Antwerp, 1552, fol.; with a Lati translation, by Adolphus Orcanus, Basel, 1552 8vo.; by H. Wolphius, Jena, 1590, 8vo.

4. Orationes duae de Rebus Peloponnesiacis on stituendis, one addressed to the emperor Manne Palaeologus, and the other to the despot Theodo rus. Ed. with a Latin translation, together with the Editio Princeps of the Eclogae of Stobaeus, by G. Canterus, Antwerp, 1575, fol.

5. Περὶ ὧν Αριστοτέλης προς Πλάτωνα διαφέ petal, De Platonicae atque Aristotelicae Philosophi Differentia. Ed.:-The Greek text, with a Latin paraphrase, by Bernardinus Donatus, Venice, 1532, 8vo.; the same, with a dissertation of Donatus an the same subject, ib. 1540, 8vo.; the same, with the same dissertation, Paris, 1541, 8vo.; a Latin translation, by G. Chariandrus, Basel, 1574, 4to. This is one of his most remarkable works.

account of the extraordinary amount of knowledge which he possessed in nearly all the branches of science; and the great number of writings which he left prove that his surname was by no means mere flattery. Gemistus was one of the deputies of the Greek church that were present at the council of Florence, held in 1438, under pope Eugenius IV., for the purpose of effecting a union between the Latin and Greek churches. Gemistus at first was rather opposed to that union, since his opinion on the nature of the Holy Ghost differed greatly from the belief of the Romish church, but he afterwards gave way, and, without changing his opinion on that subject, was active in promoting the great object of the council. The union, however, was not accomplished. Gemistus was still more renowned as a philosopher than as a divine. In those times the philosophy of Aristotle was prevalent, but it had degenerated into a mere science of words. Disgusted with scholastic philosophy, Gemistus made Plato the subject of long and deep study, and the propagation of the Platonic philosophy became henceforth his principal aim: the celebrated cardinal Bessarion was one of his numerous disciples. During his stay at Florence he was introduced to Cosmo de Medici; and having succeeded in persuading this distinguished man of the superiority of the system of Plato over that of Aristotle, he became the leader of a new school of philosophy in the West. Plato's philosophy became fashionable at Florence, and had soon gained so much popularity in Italy as to overshadow entirely the philosophy of Aristotle. But Gemistus and his disciples went too far: it was even said that he had attempted to substitute Platonism for Christianism; and before the end of the century Plato had ceased to be the model of Italian philosophers. Gemistus is, nevertheless, justly considered as the restorer of Platonic philosophy in Europe. He was, of course, involved in numberless controversies with the Aristotelians, in the West as well as in the East, among whombres Duae, in quibus de Immortalitate Animae ex• Georgius, of Trebizond, held a high rank, and much bitterness and violence were displayed on each side. In 1441 Gemistus was again in the Peloponnesus as an officer of the emperor: he was then advanced in years. He is said to have lived one hundred years, but we do not know when he died.

Gemistus wrote a surprising number of scientific works, dissertations, treatises, compilations, &c. concerning divinity, history, geography, philosophy, and miscellaneous subjects. Several of them have been printed. The principal are:-

1. Ἐκ τῶν Διοδώρου καὶ Πλουτάρχου, περὶ τῶν μετὰ τὴν ἐν Μαντινείᾳ μάχην, ἐν κεφαλαίοις διάAntis, being extracts of Diodorus Siculus and Plutarchus, which are better known under their Latin title, De Gestis Graecorum post pugnam ad Mantineam Duobus Libris Digesta. Editions:-The Greek text, Venice, 1503, fol.; a Latin translation, by Marcus Antonius Antimachus, Basel, 1540, 4to.; the Greek text, together with Herodotus, Basel, 1541; the Greek text, by Zacharias Orthus, professor at the university of Greifswald, Rostock, 1575, 8vo.; the same by professor Reichard, under the title Γεωργίου Γεμίστου τοῦ καὶ Πλήθωνος *Eλanvikŵv Bibλía B, Leipzig, 1770, 8vo. There are French, Italian, and Spanish translations of this book.

2. Περὶ Εἱμαρμένης, De Fato.

Edition:

5. Μαγικὰ λογία τῶν ἀπὸ Ζωροάστρου ἐξηγ 0évra. The Greek title differs in the MSS.: the work is best known under its Latin title, Oracala Magica Zoroastris, and is an essay on the religion of the ancient Persians. Ed. :-The text, with a Latin translation, by T. Opsopoeus, Paris, 1599, 8vo.; by Thryllitsch, Leipzig, 1719, 4to.

Besides these works, Gemistus made extracts of Appian's Syriaca, his object being to elucidate the history of the Macedonian kings of Syria; of Theophrastus (History of Plants); Aristotle (His tory of Animals, &c.); Diodorus Siculus (with regard to the kingdoms of Assyria and Media); Xenophon, Dionysius Halicarnasseus, and several other writers, whose works are either partly or entirely lost. He further wrote Prolegomena Artis Rhetoricae, Funeral Orations (G. Gemistii sive Plethonis et Michaelis Apostolii Orationes Fune

ponitur, nunc primum ex MSS. editae, by Professor Fülleborn, Leipzig, 1793, 8vo.); Essays on Music, Letters to Cardinal Bessarion, and other celebrated contemporaries, &c. &c., which are extant in MS. in different libraries of Europe. His geographical labours deserve particular notice. The Royal Library at Munich has a MS. of Gemistus, entitled Διαγραφὴ ἁπάσης Πελοποννήσου παραλίου al μeσoyeίov, being a description of the Peloponnesus, in which he fixes the positions according to the system of Ptolemy, with the writer's own corrections and additions. Gemistus wrote also a Topography of Thessaly, and two small treatises, the one on the form and size of the globe, and the other on some geographical errors of Strabo, which are contained in the Anecdota of Siebenkees. Laporte Dutheil, the translator of Strabo, derived considerable advantage from extracts of Gemistus, from the 7th, 8th, and 11th book of Strabo ; and the celebrated Latin edition of Ptolemy, published in 1478, and dedicated to pope Sixtus IV., by Calderino, was revised after an ancient Greek MS. of Ptolemy, in which Gemistus had written his corrections. A publication of all the different inedited MSS. of Gemistus extant in various libraries in Europe would be most desirable: the classical no less than the Oriental scholar would derive equal advantage from such an undertaking. (Fa bric. Bibl. Graec. vol. viii. p. 79, not. dd, xii. p. 85,

&c.; Leo Allatius, De Georgiis, No. 55; Wharton | (Aristoph. Nub. 52, with the Schol.), and as a in Appendix to Cave, Hist. Lit. p. 141; Boivin, distinct divinity and a companion of Aphrodite. Académie des Belles Lettres, vol. ii. p. 716; Ham- (Suidas.) Genetyllis was also considered as a surberger, Nachrichten von den vornehmsten Schrift- name of Artemis, to whom women sacrificed dogs. stellern, vol. iv. p. 712, &c.) [W. P.] (Hesych. s. v. Teveruλís; Aristoph. Lys. 2.) We also find the plural, Γενετυλλίδες, οι Γενναΐδες, as a class of divinities presiding over generation and birth, and as companions of Aphrodite Colias. (Aristoph. Thesmoph. 130; Paus. i. 1. § 4; Alciph. iii. 2; comp. Bentley ad Hor. Carm. Saec. 16.) [L. S.]

GENE'SIUS (Tevéσios), that is, “the father," a surname of Poseidon, under which he had a sanctuary near Lerna, on the sea-coast. (Paus. ii. 38. § 4.) The name is identical in meaning with Genethlius (yevélλios), under which the same god had a sanctuary at Sparta. (Paus. iii. 15. § 7.) [L. S.] GENE'SIUS, JOSEPHUS, or JOSEPHUS BYZANTI'NUS, a Byzantine writer who lived in the middle of the tenth century, is the author of a Greek history, which he wrote by order of the emperor Constantine (VII.) Porphyrogenitus. This history, which is divided into four books, and is entitled Baoiλeiŵv Biểλía A, begins with the year 813, and contains the reigns of Leo V., the Armenian, Michael II., the Stammerer, Theophilus, Michael III., and Basil I., the Macedonian, who died in 886. The work of Genesius is short, and altogether a poor compilation, or extract; but as it contains the events of a period of Byzantine history, of which we have but scanty information, it is nevertheless of importance. A MS. of this work was discovered at Leipzig in the sixteenth century, and attracted the attention of scholars. Godfrey Olearius translated it into Latin, but death prevented him from publishing his translation. It has been said that there was an edition of Genesius of 1570, published at Venice, but this is a mistake. The first edition was published at Venice by the editors of the Venetian Collection of the Byzantines, in 1733, in fol., under the title Josephi Genesii de Rebus Constantinopolitanis, &c., Libri IV.," with a Latin translation by Bergler. The editors perused the Leipzig MS. mentioned above, but they mutilated and misunderstood the text. The best edition is by Lachmann in the Bonn edition of the Byzantines, 1834, 8vo. Joannes Scylitza is the only earlier writer who mentions the name of Genesius. Fabricius shows that it is a mistake to suppose that Josephus Genesius and Josephus Byzantinus were two different persons. (Fabric. Bibl. Graec. vol. vii. p. 529; Cave, Hist. Lit. vol. ii. p. 97; Hamberger, Nachrichten von den vornehmsten Schriftstellern, vol. iii. p. 686.) [W. P.]

66

GENETAEUS (Tevntalos), a surname of Zeus, which he derived from Cape Genetus on the Euxine, where he was worshipped as etteivos, i. e. "the hospitable," and where he had a sanctuary. (Apollon. Rhod. ii. 378, 1009; Val. Flacc. v. 148; Strab. xii. p. 548.)

[L. S.]

GENETHLIUS (Tevéλios), of Patrae, in Palestine, a Greek rhetorician, who lived between the reigns of the emperors Philippus and Constantine. He was a pupil of Mucianus and Agapetus, and taught rhetoric at Athens, where he died at the early age of twenty-eight. He was an enemy and a rival of his countryman Callinicus. Suidas (s. v. Tevéλios), to whom we are indebted for this information, enumerates a variety of works which Genethlius wrote, declamations, panegyrics, and commentaries on Demosthenes; but not a trace of them has come down to us. (Comp. Eudoc. p. 100; Hesych. Miles. s. v. Tevéλios.) [L. S.]

GENETYLLIS (TeveruλXís), the protectress of births, occurs both as a surname of Aphrodite

VOL. IL

GE'NITRIX, that is, "the mother," is used by Ovid (Met. xiv. 536) as a surname of Cybele, in the place of mater, or magna mater, but it is better known, in the religious history of Rome, as a surname of Venus, to whom J. Caesar dedicated a temple at Rome, as the mother of the Julia gens. (Suet. Caes. 61, 78, 84; Serv. ad Aen. i. 724.) In like manner, Elissa (Dido), the founder of Carthage, is called Genitrix. (Sil. Ital. i. 81.) [L. S.] GE'NIUS, a protecting spirit, analogous to the guardian angels invoked by the Church of Rome. The belief in such spirits existed both in Greece and at Rome. The Greeks called them dalμoves, daemons, and appear to have believed in them from the earliest times, though Homer does not mention them. Hesiod (Op. et Dies, 235) speaks of daiμoves, and says that they were 30,000 in number, and that they dwelled on earth unseen by mortals, as the ministers of Zeus, and as the guardians of men and of justice. He further conceives them to be the souls of the righteous men who lived in the golden age of the world. (Op. et Dies, 107; comp. Diog. Laert. vii. 79.) The Greek philosophers took up this idea, and developed a complete theory of daemons. Thus we read in Plato (Phaedr. p. 107), that daemons are assigned to men at the moment of their birth, that thenceforward they accompany men through life, and that after death they conduct their souls to Hades. Pindar, in several passages, speaks of a yevélλios daluwv, that is, the spirit watching over the fate of man from the hour of his birth, which appears to be the same as the dii genitales of the Romans. (Ol. viii. 16, xiii. 101, Pyth. iv. 167; comp. Aeschyl. Sept. 639.) The daemons are further described as the ministers and companions of the gods, who carry the prayers of men to the gods, and the gifts of the gods to men (Plat. Sympos. p. 202; Appul. de Deo Socrat. 7), and accordingly float in immense numbers in the space between heaven and earth. The daemons, however, who were exclusively the ministers of the gods, seem to have constituted a distinct class; thus, the Corybantes, Dactyls, and Cabeiri are called the ministering daemons of the great gods (Strab. x. p. 472); Gigon, Tychon, and Orthages are the daemons of Aphrodite (Hesych. s. v. Fryvŵv; Tzetz. ad Lycophr. 538); Hadreus, the daemon of Demeter (Etym. Magn. s. v. 'Adpeús), and Acratus, the daemon of Dionysus. (Paus. i. 2. § 4.) It should, however, be observed that all daemons were divided into two great classes, viz. good and evil daemons. The works which contain most information on this interesting subject are Appuleius, De Deo Socratis, and Plutarch, De Genio Socratis, and De Defectu Oraculorum. Later writers apply the term dalμoves also to the souls of the departed. (Lucian, De Mort. Pereg. 36; Dorville, ad Chariton. i. 4.)

The Romans seem to have received their theory concerning the genii from the Etruscans, though

R

« 前へ次へ »