implying all kinds, of violent deaths which the martyrs suffered. because no other kind of suffering is here, spoken of. In this part of the verse, all are included who had suffered, either as witnesses for Jesus, after his advent, or for the word of God, before his incarnation; for many, from the martyrdom of Abel, the son of Adam, till the time of Christ, had suffered death for the word of God. The Revelator is very clear in stating, that he saw the souls of such as had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands, seated upon thrones; consequently, such saints as had lived before the time of the beast alluded to, as well as after, are included; for what Christian since the time of Christ, or worshipper of the true God before Christ, ever received those marks? Wherefore, all saints, in every age of the world, till the time of the general judgment, are included among the saints seated upon thrones, as spoken of by St. John. From which we learn, that not only those saints who are martyrs, in the violent sense of the word, are to be privileged in the first resurrection, but all others also, except such as shall be alive when the event arrives, and such as shall be born during the time of the Millennium, who will not fall away in the time of Gog and Magog. But even those saints are also included in the Revelator's view, among those seated on the thrones, because neither had these received the abominable mark.

But if any still incline to imagine that the Christian martyrs only are meant in the verse, they would do well to recollect, that all saints, in all ages, are truly martyrs, inasmuch as they partake of the spirit of the martyrs, and would as certainly have sealed their testimony with their blood, if called to it, as those who did.

The words of Christ favour this opinion, when he said, “they who will live godly in Christ Jesus, shall suffer persecution ;” and are consequently martyrs: if not in the violent sense of the term, they are in spirit, and must therefore have part in the first resurrection, except those before excepted. Although these are spoken of as reigning, scated upon thrones, a thousand years only, yet when that time expires, we may not suppose that they are then to come down from them, but shall still be privileged with them, together with all those other saints who had not died at the

time of the first resurrection, and all such as shall not fall away in the time of Gog and Magog. On these accounts, therefore, I cannot receive the opinion, that so partial a resurrection as that. of the martyrs who died violent deaths, is only embraced in the 4th verse of the 20th chapter of Revelations. [Referred from page 251.]

(3.)

Referred from page 258.]

Upon the most prominent subject of this extraordinary chapter. (Rev. xx.) SCEPTICISM, from a quarter least to have been suspected, seems to treat the subject, namely, that of understanding the thousand years there spoken of in a literal sense, as uncertain. This scepticism consists in the supposition, that the thousand years there spoken of so frequently, should be understood as prophetic years, instead of natural. Consequently, have imagined that those years, which, together with other Scriptures, are the foundation of the doctrine of a Millennium, should be multiplied by the number 360, as that is the number which comprehends a Jewish year and have therefore multiplied the thousand years of that chapter by the above number, which produces a threc hundred and sixty thousand years' Millennium, instead of the simple one thousand. But I do not know of any passage in the Holy Scriptures, upon which to seize as a precedent to justify such an opinion: I do not recollect any portion of holy writ in any of the prophets, nor in the New Testament, where years are spoken of, which will bear such an interpretation: and it would be singular indeed, if the years so frequently mentioned in that chapter, are alone, in all the book of God, to bear such an explication.

་

There are accounts in the sacred volume, of days, of weeks, and of months, which may be understood as prophetic. For instance, in the book of Daniel's prophecy, (see chap. 8, verse 11,、 where it is stated, that after two thousand three hundred days, the sanctuary should be cleansed. Those days, beyond all doubt, signify as many natural years, which is agreed to by all who be stow any attention upon the subject. In the same prophet, there is an account of a certain number of weeks, which are also prephetic, and signify as many years as there are amount of days in

the number of weeks mentioned. See Daniel ix. 24. Seventy wecks are determined upon thy people, &c. These weeks are clearly prophetic, and related to the coming of the Messiah; and embraced in their meaning as many years as there are days in seventy natural weeks, reckoning as the Jews do-30 days to a month, and 360 days to a year. These prophetic weeks amount, consequently, to four hundred and ninety years, and extend from the time of the vision of Daniel, to the advent of Christ. This is also agreed to on all hands.

We have also an account of prophetic months. See Rev. ix. 5. And to them it was given that they should not kill them, but they should be tormented five months; which, according to the rule of prophecy, amount to as many years as there are days in five months, and therefore signify one hundred and fifty natural years. The tormentors here alluded to, were, doubtless, the Mahommedan soldiers, who were permitted to continue their ravages, for the establishment of their religion and empire, one hundred and fifty years. This is an historical fact; and compre hends the time of the Saracen incursions, to which, no doubt, the Revelator prophetically alluded.

Other instances from the Scriptures, of prophetic days, weeks, and months, might be enumerated; but we find no account of years, which signify a prophetical multiplication after the same manner, or that bear any resemblance to such a calculation.Consequently there exists no data in scripture, to justify any such interpretation of the thousand years spoken of in the 20th of Revelations and how this chimera ever possessed the mind of any person, is to me quite unaccountable. The thousand years, therefore, so frequently and plainly stated in that chapter, which relate to the binding of Satan, and to the reigning of those who shall be counted saints at the time of the first resurrection, should he understood in the literal sense. But if any are still disposed to consider those passages which relate to the thousand years, in a prophetic sense, perhaps the following method of interpreting scripture, according to such a rule, will convince them. For I consider it equally warrantable, to make the application of the same mode of reasoning to any other account of YEARS mentioned in the Scriptures, as to that.

Our first instance shall be the case of Abraham, when God

1

66

said to him, (see Gen. xv. 13,) “Know of a surety, that thy seed shall be a stranger in a strange land, that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them FOUR HUNDRED YEARS." Now if the one thousand years spoken of in Rev. xx. are to be understood as prophetical, and therefore signify, instead of 1000 natural years, three hundred and sixty thousand; then by the unerring rule of arithmetical calculations, the four hundred years, mentioned by the God of Abraham, which foretold the Egyptian bondage of his seed, the Jews, must mean one hundred and forty-four thousand years, instead of four hundred; because according to the rule with which we are finding fault, we are to multiply the 400 years by 360, which are the number of days in a Jewish year. Again, Methuselah is said to have lived nine hundred and sixty-nine years, (see Gen. v. 27,) now multiply these according to the rule which we oppose, and we have the amazing product of 348,840, instead of the simple nine hundred and sixty-nine natural years. Again, St. Paul states, (see 2d Cor. xii. 2,) that he had known a man" in Christ about fourteen years ago,” caught up to the third heaven," and doubtless, meant himself. Now if this rule be applied, to interpret this account of St. Pauls, it will follow, that instead of fourteen natural years, we shall have to believe that it was five thousand and forty years, which would carry us back from the time in which Paul made this statement, beyond the time in which the world was made, in the beginning. Perhaps these three instances are sufficient to show the absurdity of such a calculation, or manner of interpreting the term, years, when mentioned in the sacred writings, whatever they may relate to, or whenever they may occur; for from a course like this, the whole book of God is thrown into obscurity, darkness, confusion and falsehood the most palpable. Let us therefore receive St. John's account as it is, respecting the thousand years, and not undertake to add to them without some data, and authority from the scriptures. Notwithstanding St. John spoke as a prophet, when he foretold the binding of Satan, and the reign of the saints, that the term should be a thousand years, yet that circumstance by no means justifies the idea that a thousand years signifying a longer time than is simply expressed in the text, any more than the years mentioned to Abraham respecting the slavery of his seed

Kk

in Egypt, could signify a longer time than is simply stated, which was four hundred years. The prophet Jeremiah, plainly foretold that his countrymen, the Jews, should "serve the king of Babylon seventy years,” (see Jer. xxv. 11.) This kind of expression by this prophet which relates to futurity, is no more nor less definite with respect to the term years, than St. John is, where he foretells that a thousand years, shall be the term of the reigning of the saints on earth. But if we are to understand the Revelator as some would incline to do, then it must follow, that instead of the people of the Jews, serving that identical king of Babylon seventy years, as foretold by their prophet, they should serve him twenty-five thousand two hundred years.

From these instances, it is plain therefore, that wherever the term years occur in the sacred volume, we should understand it in its most literal sense. Consequently, the thousand years so often repeated by the Revelator, signifies simply what it states, no more nor less. Which establishes the doctrine that between the first and second resurrections, there shall be literally one thousand years, as argued in the eighth division of this book, and was also held in the primitive church, in the time of Polycarp, who had been a pupil of the Revelator himself. [Referred from page 258.)

(C.)

[Referred from page 286.]

There are other reasons that heaven designed to clothe our fore parents, than those which I have stated on that subject, in the eighth division of this work. For it is evident that every grade of animal being, from the equinox to the poles, are fitted in their constitutions, mode of living, and manner of defence, whether against heat or cold, wet or dry, to suit the climate where they exist, But man in his primeval state of nakedness, was not suited to any climate, for if he had even in Eden been exposed to the down pouring rays of a vertical sun, the fair and delicate surface of his person would doubtless have suffered by the scorching heat; for we may not suppose him, even in the garden of Eden, insensible to feeling. But from this inconvenience, their Creator had undoubtedly shrowded them beneath the shading branches of the groves of paradise. But however accommodating this circum