A

LETTER

TO THE

PUBLISHER,

Occafioned by the first correct

Edition of the DUNCIA D.

I

T is with pleasure I hear, that you have pro

cured a correct copy of the DUNCIAD, which the many furreptitious ones have rendered fo neceffary; and it is yet with more, that I am informed it will be attended with a CoMMENTARY: A Work fo requifite, that I cannot think the Author himself would have omitted it, had he approved of the first appearance of this Poem.

Such Notes as have occurred to me I herewith fend you: You will oblige me by inferting them amongst those which are, or will be, tranfmitted to you by others; fince not only the Author's friends, but even ftrangers, appear engaged by humanity, to take fome care of an Orphan of so much genius and fpirit,

which its parent feems to have abandoned from the very beginning, and fuffered to step into the world naked, unguarded, and unattended.

It was upon reading fome of the abufive papers lately published, that my great regard to a Perfon, whofe Friendship I eftcem as one of the chief honours of my life, and a much greater refpect to Truth, than to him or any man living, engaged me in enquiries, of which the inclosed Notes are the fruit.

I perceived, that most of these Authors had been (doubtless very wifely) the first aggreffors. They had tried, 'till they were weary, what was to be got by railing at each other: Nobody was either concerned or furprized, if this or that fcribler was proved a dunce. But every one was curious to read what could be faid to prove Mr. POPE one, and was ready to pay fomething for fuch a discovery: A ftratagem, which would they fairly own, it might not only reconcile them to me, but fcreen them from the refentment of their lawful Superiors, whom they daily abufe, only (as I charitably hope) to get that by them, which they cannot get from them.

I found this was not all: Il fuccefs in that had tranfported them to Perfonal abyfe, either of himself, or (what I think he could lefs forgive) of his Friends. They had called Men of virtue and honour bad Men, long before he had either leifure or inclination to call them bad Writers: And fome had been fuch old offenders, that he had quite forgotten their perfons as well as their flanders, 'till they were pleafed to re

vive them.

Now what had Mr. POPE done before, to incenfe them? He had published those works which are in the hands of every body, in which not the leaft mention is made of any of them. And what has hé

done fince? He has laughed, and written the DUNCIAD. What has that said of them? A very ferious truth, which the public had faid before, that they were dull And what it had no fooner faid, but they themselves were at great pains to procure, or even purchase room in the prints, to teftify under their hands to the truth of it.

I should still have been filent, if either I had seen any inclination in my friend to be ferious with such accufers, or if they had only meddled with his Writings; fince whoever publifhes, puts himself on his trial by his Country. But when his Moral character was attacked, and in a mariner from which neither truth nor virtue can fecure the most innocent, in a manner, which, though it annihilates the credit of the accufation with the juft and impartial, yet aggravates very much the guilt of the accufers; I mean by Authors without names; then I thought, fince the danger was common to all, the concern ought to be fo; and that it was an act of juftice to detect the Authors, not only on this account, but as many of them are the fame who for feveral years paft have made free with the greatest names in Church and State, expofed to the world the private misfortunes of Families, abused all, even to Women, and whose prostituted papers (for one or other Party, in the unhappy divifions of their Country) have infulted the Fallen, the Friendless, the Exil'd, and the Dead.

I am

Befides this, which I take to be a public concern, I have already confeffed I had a private one. one of that number who have long loved and efteemed Mr. POPE; and had often declared it was not his eapacity or writings (which we ever thought the leaft valuable part of his character) but the honest, open, and beneficent man, that we moft efteemed,

and loved in him. Now, if what these people fay were believed, I must appear to all my friends either a fool, or a knave; either imposed on myself, or impofing on them; fo that I am as much interested in the confutation of these calumnies, as he is himfelf.

I am no Author, and confequently not to be fufpected either of jealousy or refentment against any of the men, of whom scarce one is known to me by fight; and as for their Writings, I have fought them (on this one occafion) in vain, in the clofets and libraries of all my acquaintance. I had ftill been in the dark, if a Gentleman had not procured me (I fuppofe from fome of themselves, for they are generally much more dangerous friends than enemies) the paffages I fend you. I folemnly protest I have added nothing to the malice or abfurdity of them; which it behoves me to declare, fince the vouchers themfelves will be fo foon and fo irrecoverably loft. You may in fome meafure prevent it, by preferving at leaft their Titles, and difcovering (as far as you can depend on the truth of your information) the Names of the concealed authors.

The first objection I have heard made to the Poem is, that the perfons are too obfcure for fatire. The perfons themselves, rather than allow the objection, would forgive the fatire; and if one could be tempted to afford it a ferious anfwer, were not all affaffinates, popular infurrections, the infolence of the rabble without doors, and of domeftics within, moft wrongfully chaftifed, if the Meannefs of offenders indemnified them from punishment? On the contrary, Obfcurity renders them more dangerous, as lefs

a Which we have done in a Lift printed in the Appendix.

thought of: Law can pronounce judgment only on open facts; Morality alone can pafs cenfure on intentions of mischief; fo that for fecret calumny, or the arrow flying in the dark, there is no public punishment left, but what a good Writer inflicts.

The next objection is, that these fort of authors are poor. That might be pleaded as an excufe at the Old Baily, for leffer crimes than Defamation, (for 'tis the cafe of almost all who are tried there) but fure it can be none: For who will pretend that the robbing another of his Reputation fupplies the want of it in himfelf? I question not but fuch authors are poor, and heartily wish the objection were removed by any honeft livelihood. But Poverty is here the accident, not the subject: He who describes Malice and Villany to be pale and meagre, expreffes not the leaft anger against Palenefs or Leannefs, but against Malice and Villany. The Apothecary in Romeo and Juliet is poor; but is he therefore juftified in vending poison? Not but Poverty itself becomes a juft fubject of fatire, when it is the confequence of vice, prodigality, or neglect of one's lawful calling; for then it increases the public burden, fills the streets and highways with Robbers, and the garrets with Clippers, Coiners, and Weekly Journalists.

But admitting that two or three of thefe offend lefs in their morals, than in their writings; muft Poverty make nonsense facred? If fo, the fame of bad aụthors would be much better confulted than that of all the good ones in the world; and not one of an hundred had ever been called by his right name.

They mistake the whole matter: It is not charity to encourage them in the way they follow, but to get them out of it; for men are not bunglers be