ページの画像
PDF
ePub

ment: the last books of the Confes sions appeared in 1788; since which period, new accounts have been gradu ally appearing, almost yearly, to throw light on his character and actions. The Memoires of Madame d'Epinay, and Grimm's Literary Correspondence in particular, renewed the whole controversy, some twelve or thirteen years, since. There have been no less than eleven different publications-Voyages to the Hermitage, which is not three leagues from Paris. And to crown all, a work has appeared the other day, which has for its scope, an utter annihilation of all the antagonists of the philosopher."

Any one that has heard of the fa mous Confessions, would suppose that a life of the author was needless. But, besides that the Confessions are a closed volume, even for men who have any regard for decency and their own dig nity, they convey little intelligence of that part of literary life which would be valuable to know. The first six books are mere annals of debauchery, which the wretched old man, when he wrote, dwelt on, in spite of years and disease, with a fondness that is disgusting. He confesses, with deep contrition, having forsaken his friend in an epileptic fit, and having purloined a piece of red ribband; but he details with a jocularity and enjoyment in conceivable, and without the least symptom of shame, habits and actions so filthy, so horrible, so beastly-our language, thank heaven! has no name for them. The six last books, with the exception of his account of his productions, which is extremely interest ing, are a kind of thermometer of friendship, containing an accurate me morial of kisses given and received, visits, slights, huffs, quarrels, mysteries, and suspicions. Diderot misses an appointment with him-Grimm sits down in his chair-the young Duke of Villeroi quizzes him for calling his dog Duke, and then changing it to Turk, for fear of giving offence; and this, he observes, brought a scolding on the Duke from his mamma, which made

him

poor Jean Jacques's enemy for life -the Marechale de Luxembourg did not hug him tight enough at partingt his friends did not shed tears of joy

when they met him-these are the serious complaints and miseries of a watchmaker's son, who, after forty years of indigence and vagabondism, is admitted into the first societies and friendships of Europe-lodged by marshals, caressed by duchesses, served with game by the very hands of a prince of the blood, and sought after by royalty itself, which introduction he was obliged to refuse, because his debauched life had entailed on him a disease, that rendered him incapable of remaining in the antichamber for an hour without retiring. His refusal was nevertheless attributed to his in dependence.

The verdict of English juries on unfortunate suicides is much the same, and produced by the same motive, as the public opinion of Rousseau. The word insanity is allowed to cover and excuse his sins ;-the worst that an enemy can do, is to apologize for him, and this is the attempt of the author of the Life lately published. The work is merely one of compilation and research, it contains some letters that have not before seen the light, and its attempts at exculpation are narrowly spiteful, and at times ignorant (espe cially in the case of Hume) without producing the least effect. The his tory of the works of J. Jacques, with which it closes, and which is the only part of the volumes worthy of at tention, had appeared word for word some years back, prefixed to an edition of "Emile," &c.

Jean Jacques Rousseau was born at Geneya in the year 1712. He was bound apprentice, first to a register keeper, then to an engraver, from whom he ran away. Having turned Catholic for food, he became a catechumen at Turin, then a lackey; after having inspired a noble family with interest for him, he was in the high road to preferment, and even one of the sons of his noble benefactor took upon him to instruct the little vagabond. Jean Jacques, however, vanished, and occupied various stations in a few years,-interpreter to a Greek archimandrite, a music-master,a tutor,--gentleman of the chamber to Ma❤ dame de Warens; till having hit upon what he thought a discovery-a new

Histoire de la Vie et des Ouvrages de J. J. Rousseau, par V. D. Musset-Pathay. +Madame la Maréchale n'embrassa plusieurs fois d'un air assez triste; mais je ne sentis plus dans ces embrassements les étreintes de ceux qu'elle m'avoit prodigués il y avoit deux ou trois ans."-Confessions, Livre XI,

mode of noting music, he set off for Paris in the year 1741, being nearly thirty years of age.

Rousseau has given us, in his Confessions, ample details of the develope ment of his youthful intellect-they are impossible to relate; suffice it to say, that they are a disgrace to human nature. With the help of his father, J. Jacques exhausted a library of romances at seven years of age, an occupation not likely to improve his tendencies. While at Madame de Warens, she sent him to M. D'Aubonne, a man of intrigue, and an adventurer, to see what he was fit for. "The result of his observation was, that in spite of an animated physiognomy and pleasing exterior, he was, if not quite a fool,at least a child of little spirit, without ideas or acquirements, of a very limited capa city, and that the highest honour he could look forward to, would be at most a village curacy at some distant day." Rousseau confesses that his appearance and conversation justified the unfavourable impression. His remarks on the opinion of D'Aubonne are worthy of quotation:

"This langour of thought, united with this vivacity of feeling, I experience not only in conversation, but even when alone, and occupied with reflection. My ideas arrange them selves in my head with incredible difficulty. They circulate dully-ferment in my mind to distraction,-put me into a sweat and palpitation; in the midst of this emotion I see nothing clearly, and cannot write a word -I must wait.* Insensibly the distraction subsides, the chaos dissipates; each idea steps into its place, but slowly, and after long and confused agitation. Have you ever seen the opera in Italy? During the changes of the scene there reigns a long and disagreeable disorder-all the decorations are intermingled, pulled and hawled about, and seem ready to overturn. Nevertheless, in an instant every thing is set to rights and arranged, and one is surprised to see such a tumult succeeded by a delightful spectacle. Thus it is with my brain when I would write. If I had known at first to wait, and then render into beauty the images that have presented themselves, few authors would have surpassed me.

"Hence comes the extreme difficulty with which I compose. My manuscripts are scratched, scribbled, jum-" bled, illegible, and attest the pain they have cost me. There is not one which I have not been obliged to tran→ scribe four or five times ere I sent it to press. I could never do any thing with pen in hand over a table and pa per:-it is in walking through rocks and woods, in the night, while in bed and sleepless, that I write in my brain, and people may judge with what dif ficulty and length of time, since I am totally deprived of all power of verbal memory, and never in my life could retain six verses by heart. There are some of my periods that I have turned over and over in my head for six nights, ere they were in a state to be put on paper. Hence it is, that I have succeeded better in those kinds of composition which demand labour, than in those which require lightness, as letters-a species of writing of which I have never been able to catch the tone, and which puts me to the torture. I never write a letter on the most trivial subject that does not cost me hours of fatigue; or if I write what first comes into my head, I know not how to commence or finish-my letter is a long and confused verbiage, that scarce can be understood when read.

"It costs me this trouble not only to render my ideas, but to receive them. I have studied men ; I think myself an acute observer, nevertheless I know nothing of what I see. I see nothing well but what I recall, and have no power but in my recollections. Of all that is said and done in my presence, I neither can perceive, nor penetrate the motive-it is merely the exterior sign that strikes me. But afterwards the whole scene returns-the place, the time, the tone, the look, the gesture, the circumstance,-nothing escapes me. Then I find the motives and the meaning of all that was said or done; and rarely am I deceived.”Confessions, Livre 3.

This sottish stupidity at the time that presence of mind was most wanting, and this habit of recollective penetration afterwards, were the principal causes of all the miseries of the philosopher. Happy enough when in

• This is a complete key to the philosophy of Jean Jacques, and to that of temperament in general.

company, he had the knack of discovering when he left it, that they had been making game of him all the time -the consequence was, that he took the first opportunity of insulting his friends. A little more reflection, accompanied with kindness on their part, again undeceived him, and he hurried to a reconciliation. And in reflecting upon this reconciliation, he was sure to fall back again into mistrust. Thus he complains that Grimm received him en empereur Romain, and that Madam D'Epinay forgave his first insolence merely to lay a plot for what he calls his ruin. The Encyclopedists, and all those whom he stigmatizes under the name of the Holbachich coterie, merely wanted to humanize him, to have him amongst them, to make him happy, and an atheist, (which was certainly very kind of them):-they read lectures to him, like a child, which hurt him severely, and used very unwarrantable means, it must be allowed, to separate him from his commandantes Therèse and her mother. All this was at first carried on with very kind intentions, but when they had deserted him, and found that instead of becoming, as they had conjectured, utterly forsaken, he was taken up by the Marechale de Luxembourg and the grandees of the court; then no doubt their hate grew black, and their hostility treacherous.

When Rousseau arrived in Paris, he presented his scheme for noting music to the Institute-it was not considered worthy of being followed up. He had also with him his comedy of Narcisse, for which he could gain no attention; nor did it merit any. His knowledge of music gained him the acquaintance of Diderot, whose conversation awoke his dormant predilections for literature. These were evinced by a curious occupation for a young enthusiast. "Every morning," says he, "about ten o'clock, I betook myself to walk in the Luxembourg, with a Virgil and a Rousseau in my pocket, and there occupied myself till dinner, endeavouring to learn by heart an ode or a burlesque, without thinking what I learnt to-day was forgotten to-morrow." At length he is introduced to Madam Dupin, a lady of the first rank and fashion in the capital, and here he makes his debut by writing to the lady a declaration of love-he is forbidden the house. After spending some time

in musical composition, he becomes secretary to the French embassy ať Venice. In this respectable and delicate situation, which he obtained through the interest of Madam De Broglie, Rousseau conducted himself with great integrity and credit, and his quarrel with the Chevalier Montaign, and subsequent dismission by that wrong-headed ambassador, forms one of the very few exceptions of a contention in which Jean Jacques was in the right.

Soon after this commences the era of his reputation-the Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, which won the prize of the Dijon Academy. This essay is the germe of Rousseau's opinions

all his subsequent writings are but an extension, of the same paradox. The question proposed is, Whether the sciences and arts have tended to purify or to corrupt general morals? Rousseau chose the field for eloquence, and supported the opinion of their being the causes of corruption; his success pointed out paradox to him as the easiest road to fame, and he failed not to make good use of the discovery. The author himself has confessed this discourse to be void of all merit, notwithstanding, as Diderot observed, "it took above the clouds;" he has recapitulated and summed up his opinions on the subject many years after -when he had had full time to consider what he at first put forward has tily-in the preface to "Narcissus. He there allows the validity of the objection, that literature, because it is attended with corruption, does not necessarily produce it; but then, says he, books are produced by idleness, and the desire of distinction, &c.-he confesses the argument to be unanswerable; and, as if he had never heard of it, runs on, addle-headed, in the

same strain. The controversy, on either side, is not worth one moment's consideration, but it is a sample of the logic of Jean Jacques. There is a doubt whether he espoused in this case the side hostile to letters, of his own accord, or by the suggestion of Diderot. Rousseau asserts, that the idea arose in his mind, during a walk to see his friend, who was confined for his "Lettres sur les Aveugles," in the Donjon of Vincennes, and ushers it in with great effect, as they do the entrance of heroes on the stage, with all kinds of thunder and trumpets. "At the in

stant," says he, "I saw another universe, and became another man," according to his account, it put him all in a perspiration; we think that he might account for any extraordinary heat, by the walk in the middle of summer, from Paris to Vincennes. Diderot tells another story, and quite as circumstantial, that Jean Jacques had determined on the same side of the question, but that he shewed the advantage of paradox-I induced him to take the part he did;-the question is not worth deciding.

The discourse was written in 1749, and Rousseau quitted Paris for Mont morenci in 1756. These seven years may be considered the first epochs of his literary life;-during it he produced the "Devin du Village," and the Essay" Sur l'inégalite des Conditions." This latter is a sequel of his first paradox, which he subsequently carried to its extent in the Contrat Social. The literary connexions which had such influence on his future temper and actions, and concerning which there have arisen so many subjects of debate, were formed, or at least established, during this period. His chief intimacy was with Grimm, who was, at best, a worthless puppy; and with Diderot, whose literary fame, already established, did not allow him to meet Rousseau's friendship on an equality, Jean Jacques was, in simplicity and forwardness, all his life a child, and could never comprehend those different shades of intimacy which are so distinct, although politeness veils them with the same mask. He gave his whole heart to the persons he had taken a fancy to, and expected, without any compromise or delay, a like return. The act of shaking hands was a scene with him, and he was equally disappointed and ashamed when he found these emotions confined to himself. Upon his first visit to Diderot, at Vincennes, he rushed into the arms of his friend, and dissolved into tears; he afterwards complained bitterly, that Diderot, instead of weeping, as in duty bound, merely observed to the company, "You see how my friends love me. The very same omission is one of his chief complaints against David Hume, who, in one of his letters, as serts, that he was much affected:Rousseau, however, was not satisfied, he wanted tears, and that from two

materialists, who would belie their creed at every sob. Grimm was a hypocrite, a mere pretender in feeling as in every thing else; of his conduct there might be reason to complainbut it never appears that Diderot made a promise of any romantic attachment. The sentence of the latter, "none but the wicked love solitude," or something to that effect, was the commencement of the quarrel;-mark the sophism by which Rousseau replies:"If a man be alone, what harm can he offer to any one?” as if wickedness consisted solely in our relations with others. But this was evidently his morality: the least harm to another is marked by deep contrition in his Confessions, while the abominable sins that he committed against himself are told without the least remorse. It was at this period that Rousseau, who could not meet his friends without tears in his eyes, packed off his five children, one after another, to the foundling establishment at Paris; the first was sent with a cipher, but even that precaution was not thought worth taking with the others. Of this his enemies made a fertile subject of accusation in the sequel; and, as may be supposed, all his attempts at exculpation but aggravated his crime.

After the success of his little opera, in which Madame de Pompadour even deigned to act the part of Colin, Rousseau fancies that all his friends grew cold towards him. "They could have pardoned me," says he, "for having written books, and excellent books, but having succeeded in an opera, a path in which they could never follow me, I could never obtain forgiveness." This is manifestly the surmise of nar row vanity and suspicion; had his friends been envious, they could not have met any thing more to their wishes, than to see him distracted from literature by musical composition. His removal from Paris soon effected a total separation from his old friends. While walking with Madame d'Epinay on her domain of La Chevrette, Jean Jacques admired the situation of the hermitage, and seemed struck with the beauty and retirement of the spot. Madame d'Epinay made no remark on the occasion, but immediately 'employed workmen to fit up the residence, and leading Rousseau one day unexpectedly to the place,-" My

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]

"Emile" and "La Nouvelle Heloise" were produced in the solitude of the Hermitage. "Emile" was undertaken first, but completed after the publication of" Heloise." The latter was published in 1759, and nothing can equal the fury with which it was sought after. "The men of letters were divided in opinion concerning it," writes the author, and they are so yet. The philosophes set it down as a mere imitation of Richardson. "Heloise," say they, "is Clarissa, Claire, Miss Howe." M. Musset-Pathay, in attempting to defend the originality of Rousseau from this imputation, confirms the opinion beyond a doubt, by mentioning the note in which Rousseau combats the principles of Richardson-people always borrow under the name of amending. An accusation of the same kind, and with equal justice, was applied to the "Emile;" "Que le fond des idées de l'Emile est tout entier, dans Plutarque, dans Montaigne, et dans Locke, trois auteurs qui étoient constamment dans les mains de J. J." To point out the beauties

or the defects of the Heloise is needless; it was written for a certain class of society, and for certain manners and modes of living, now out of fashion even in France. For them it was a moral work; for Mesdames d'Epinay, d'Houdetot, and the circle around them, it was a sermon; to us it more resembles an insult. We may conceive an idea of the morals of the time from a passage in the Confessions-he is speaking of the success of this novel;

So inebriated were the women with the book and its author, that there was scarce one female, even of the highest rank, of whom I could not have made a conquest, had I wished it. I have proofs of what I write," &c. And this is from a man of fifty, an old debauchee, "revered and ruptured," as Canning says.

The "Heloise" insured the success of "Emile," which, had it been published first, would most likely not have produced many of the wonderful effects it has. All the people to whom he read it in manuscript, fell fast asleep; and he complains that St Lambert took ample vengeance of his treason by snoring while the author read

* Montmorenci had long the honour of giving its name to the proud family of the Constable of France. By one of the daughters of that house it passed into the possession of the family of Condé, who changed its name to that of Anguien-the title that was borne by the unfortunate victim of Bonaparte. It is about four leagues north-west of Paris, situated on the declivity of a hill; between it and the wood of Montmorenci is the valley of the Hermitage. Southward of the town was the chateau of the Marechale de Luxembourg, so often mentioned by Rousseau; it was destroyed during the Revolution, but the celebrated terrace, described in the Confessions, yet exists, and presents the same splendid view he loved to contemplate. The chateau Chemette was purchased after the death of Madame d'Epinay, by M. Sommeriva; it is at the back of La Barre, facing the hill, and looks as gay as if it was yet inhabited by Madame d'Epinay and her various favourites.

The Hermitage is a great object of attraction for travellers; and an Auberge Anglais, on the little road that leads from the town to it, witnesses what country is most assiduous in paying its respects. The house and garden passed, after Rousseau's death, into the hands of Grétry, the composer, whose bust and pillar, containing his heart, stand in the garden, rather impudently rivalling the manes of Rousseau. There also stands in a niche, a very characteristic bust of Jean Jacques, surrounded with pencil scribbling, and beneath it is inscribed the reproachful tribute of Madame d'Epinay :

"Toi dont les plus brûlants écrits
Furent créés dans cet humble Hermitage,
Rousseau, plus éloquent que sage,
Pourquoi quittas-tu mon pays?

Toi même avais choisi ma retraite paisible;
Je t'offris le bonheur, et tu l'as dédaigné ;

Tu fus ingrat, mon cœur en a saigné ;

Mais qu' ai-je à retracer à mon âme sensible?

Je te vois, je te lis, et tout est pardonné."

This was written when she was in dread of the Confessions, and is unjust, for she turned Rousseau out of the Hermitage.

The house at present belongs to Mr Flammand Grétry, who has written a thick poem on the subject of his habitation-we can speak as to nothing but its thickness. Half the mansion is at present occupied by a Scotch gentleman of the name of Camp

bell.

13

1

« 前へ次へ »