Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of PoliticsUniversity of Chicago Press, 2005 - 221 ページ Can politics be studied scientifically, and if so, how? Assuming it is impossible to justify values by human reason alone, social science has come to consider an unreflective relativism the only viable basis, not only for its own operations, but for liberal societies more generally. Although the experience of the sixties has made social scientists more sensitive to the importance of values, it has not led to a fundamental reexamination of value relativism, which remains the basis of contemporary social science. Almost three decades after Leo Strauss's death, Nasser Behnegar offers the first sustained exposition of what Strauss was best known for: his radical critique of contemporary social science, and particularly of political science. Behnegar's impressive book argues that Strauss was not against the scientific study of politics, but he did reject the idea that it could be built upon political science's unexamined assumption of the distinction between facts and values. Max Weber was, for Strauss, the most profound exponent of values relativism in social science, and Behnegar's explication artfully illuminates Strauss's critique of Weber's belief in the ultimate insolubility of all value conflicts. Strauss's polemic against contemporary political science was meant to make clear the contradiction between its claim of value-free premises and its commitment to democratic principles. As Behnegar ultimately shows, values—the ethical component lacking in a contemporary social science—are essential to Strauss's project of constructing a genuinely scientific study of politics. |
他の版 - すべて表示
多く使われている語句
accept According to Strauss According to Weber Accordingly Aristotelian Aristotle atheism attempt awareness basis behavior believe character choice cial claim classical political philosophy common concern conflict consequence criticism democratic deny discussion distinction between facts Easton emphasis added empirical empiricism ence ethics facts and values fundamental genuine knowledge Heidegger historical historicism human ideals individual insist interpretation Lasswell leads Leo Strauss liberal democracy litical logic logical positivism man’s Max Weber means moral natural right Nietzsche nihilism normative notion objective old political science one’s petrifaction phenomena political philosophy political sci political scientists political things positivism possibility precisely preference principles problem question rational rational choice theorists reason regarding regimes relativism religion revelation science’s scientific sense shows situation social science social scientist society Strauss argues Strauss begins Strauss observes Strauss suggests theoretical thinkers thought tion true truth understanding universal value judgments value-free Weber's thesis Whereas