Separate Spheres No More: Gender Convergence in American Literature, 1830-1930Although they wrote in the same historical milieu as their male counterparts, women writers of the 19th- and early 20th-centuries have generally been "ghettoized" by critics into a separate canonical sphere. These original essays argue in favor of reconciling male and female writers, both historically and in the context of classroom teaching. While some of the essays pair up female and male authors who write in a similar style or with similar concerns, others address social issues shared by both men and women, including class tensions, economic problems, and the Civil War experience. Rather than privileging particular genres or certain well-known writers, the contributors examine writings ranging from novels and poetry to autobiography, utopian fiction, and essays. And they consider familiar figures like Harriet Beecher Stowe, Emily Dickinson, and Ralph Waldo Emerson alongside such lesser-known writers as Melusina Fay Peirce, Susie King Taylor, and Mary Gove Nichols. Each essay revises the binary notions that have been ascribed to males and females, such as public and private, rational and intuitive, political and domestic, violent and passive. Although they do not deny the existence of separate spheres, the contributors show the boundary between them to be much more blurred than has been assumed until now. |
この書籍内から
検索結果1-3 / 30
264 ページ
They worry that if the human mind is a blank sheet that is defined only by the
sense impressions it receives , and if all ideas derive from those sense
experiences , then human beings have no real access to each other or the world ,
and no ...
They worry that if the human mind is a blank sheet that is defined only by the
sense impressions it receives , and if all ideas derive from those sense
experiences , then human beings have no real access to each other or the world ,
and no ...
268 ページ
Senator Bird supports the Fugitive Slave Law because of an epistemological
failure ; he thinks in dehumanizing abstractions that enable him to think of “
fugitives ” without ever considering the emotions of the human beings involved in
the ...
Senator Bird supports the Fugitive Slave Law because of an epistemological
failure ; he thinks in dehumanizing abstractions that enable him to think of “
fugitives ” without ever considering the emotions of the human beings involved in
the ...
272 ページ
seems to be asking , how are human beings to find the truth in questions of
human nature ? His answer to this epistemological question is taken directly from
sentimental tradition : use sympathy . As Holgrave says , “ one never can be
certain ...
seems to be asking , how are human beings to find the truth in questions of
human nature ? His answer to this epistemological question is taken directly from
sentimental tradition : use sympathy . As Holgrave says , “ one never can be
certain ...
レビュー - レビューを書く
レビューが見つかりませんでした。
目次
Susan Warners Answer | 29 |
Emily Dickinson Thomas Wentworth | 50 |
The War of Susie King Taylor | 73 |
著作権 | |
他の 11 セクションは表示されていません
他の版 - すべて表示
多く使われている語句
American appears argues authors become body Carrie century character Child Civil claims Colored Common cooperative critics cultural death Dickinson discourse domestic early effect Emerson essay example experience fact feel female feminine feminist fiction figure force gender hand Higginson human husband ideal imperialism influence interest invasion labor later letters literary literature lives look male marriage Mary means moral mother move narrative narrator nature never nineteenth nineteenth-century notes novel Peirce physical poem political position published Queechy race reader reform relations response rhetoric role Ruth seems sense sentimental separate spheres sexual social society space stage story suggests Taylor theater things tion turn voice Wide woman women women writers writing York young