ページの画像
PDF
ePub

have to add confession of sin, deprecation of merited wrath, resistance to the flesh, and a laborious search after truth! Thus, whether we consider the time when the Sabbath was instituted, the primary reasons for its sanctification, the relations we sustain to its great Author, the blessings we have received at his hand, or our general circumstances of peril, and of pressing necessity; we are as clearly and as fully bound to keep it holy, as were Adam and Eve. Yes! the Sabbath was made for man, in his fallen and unfallen condition, in his regenerate and unregenerate state, in all the ages of his existence, in all the variety of his circumstances, and in all the lands where his lot may be cast; and nothing but ignorance, involuntary ignorance, can excuse us, if we neglect to keep it holy. Instead, therefore, of cavilling with the ordinance, or endeavouring to evade its obligation, let us revere it for its antiquity, love it for its benignity, and sanctify it in obedience to the authority, and in imitation of the example, of its great Author. Our obligation to keep the Sabbath holy may be proved,

2. From the moral law, which expressly enjoins its observance.

But,

It might have been anticipated, that Paley, and the writers at whose head he stands, after having attempted to invalidate the primitive institution of the Sabbath, would have strenuously maintained its perpetual and universal obligation, on the ground, that its sanctification is commanded in the moral law. instead of this, they have laboured to prove, that, though found in the Decalogue, it is really a part of the Jewish ceremonial; and is binding on us only by human and conventional considerations. But, " My counsel shall stand, saith the Lord'; and I will do all my pleasure." A part of his "counsel" and "pleasure," most certainly, is, that we should "remember the Sabbath. day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor

thy son, nor thy daughter, nor thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath-day, and hallowed it."

The Ten Commandments were clearly distinguished from all ritual enactments and ceremonies whatsoever, by the following circumstances: First, The ceremonial law was given by the ordinary methods of inspiration ; whereas God spake all the words of the moral law with his own lips, in the audience of all the people, accompanied by such signs of majesty, that even Moses said, "I exceedingly fear and quake; " and the people entreated that the words might not be spoken to them again, lest they should die. Secondly, The ceremonial law was written by Moses on parchment, or some such perishable material; but God wrote the moral law, with his own finger, on tables of stone. Thirdly, The ceremonial law was placed by the side of the ark, and might, at any time, have been removed; but the tables of stone, which contained the moral law, were laid up within the ark, in token of its superior excellence, and of God's supreme concern for its preservation. Fourthly, To show its everlasting connexion and harmony with the economy of grace, it was sprinkled with blood, covered with the mercy-seat, overshadowed with cherubims, and enshrined with the shechinah, or "glory of the Lord." By these extraordinary circumstances, a broad line of demarcation was established between it and the Jewish ritual: and the Sabbath law, standing, as it does, in the centre of the Decalogue, serves as a seal to the first table, and as a guard to the second; an arrangement which seems to imply that, in the divine estimation, its perpetuation and due observance are essential to the preservation of the whole law, and to the performance of the duties of both tables.

Dr. Paley endeavours to overthrow the argument, in favour of

the moral obligation of the Sabbath, drawn from the fact of its incorporation with the Decalogue, by pleading that, in several passages of Scripture, ceremonial, political, and positive duties are blended with others which are moral, and, consequently, universally binding. But we need only reply to this, that not one of the passages he adduces was written by the finger of God on tables of stone, or was spoken by God in the hearing of all the people, or was deposited in the ark, or was overshadowed with the cherubim and the glory. None of them constituted what God and his church have called "the law," "the two tables of the law," "the Ten Commandments;" and though we fully admit their inspiration, yet neither Christ nor his Apostles ever recognised any of them, as complete summaries of duty, which they often did as to the moral law.

laws in the Bible; and if not in the Bible, certainly not in the world; consequently, man is without law, the distinction between right and wrong is arbitrary, and our terrors of conscience are unnecessary; for the doctrines of human responsibility, and of eternal rewards and punishments, are, on this hypothesis, idle dreams. These, we maintain, are the legitimate consequences of the theory which stamps this commandment with a ceremonial character. But we reject the theory, and we abhor its consequences.

[ocr errors]

and

Though the appointment of the seventh day, as distinguished from other days, be of a positive character, yet the law itself is intimately, perhaps essentially, connected with several moral principles of homage to God, and mercy to men; with the obligation of religious worship, of public religious worship, and of undistracted public worship this will account for its collocation in the Decalogue with the highest duties of religion, and the leading rules of personal and social morality. Our Lord Jesus declares, that he 'came not to destroy the law and the Prophets, but to fulfil.' Take it that, by the law,' he meant both the moral and the ceremonial: ceremonial law could only be fulfilled in him, by realizing its types; and moral law, by upholding its authority. For the Prophets,' they admit of a similar distinction: they either enjoin morality, or utter prophecies of Christ; the latter of which were fulfilled in the sense of accomplishment, the former by being sanctioned and enforced. The Apostle, in answer to an objection to the doctrine of justification by faith, asks, 'Do we then make void the law through faith?' (Rom. iii. 31 ;) which is equivalent to asking, Does Christianity teach that the law is no longer obligatory on Christians, because it teaches that no man can be justified by it? To which he answers, in the most solemn form of expression, God forbid; yea, we establish the law.' Now, the sense in which the Apostle uses the term, 'the law,' in this argument, is indubitably marked in Rom. vii. 7: 'I FEBRUARY, 1842.

In conducting his anti-sabbatic argument, Dr. Paley adverts to the temporal penalties, and Jewish restrictions, which were appended to the law of the Sabbath; and argues, that, because we are not subject to them, neither are we bound by the law to which they were subjoined. But, by a similar mode of arguing, the infidel might neutralize and invalidate every precept in the two tables. The Jewish government was a theocracy,-God was their King; and the moral law formed the basis of their national polity. Hence heavy temporal penalties were annexed to the worshipping of idols, to the taking of the name of God in vain, to disobedience to parents, as well as to the violation of the Sabbath; and various ceremonial and political arrangements were made for the detection of murder, adultery, theft, and the bearing of false witness, which are not obligatory on us as Christians. therefore, the fourth commandment is to be reckoned ceremonial, because it was guarded by temporal penalties, and political restrictions, then they are all ceremonial; if it has been abrogated, then they have all been abrogated; and if so, it follows, that there is no divine code of

VOL. XXI. Third Series.

If,

K

had not known sin, but by the law : for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:' which, being a plain reference to the tenth command of the Decalogue, is the law' of which he speaks. This, then, is the law which is established by the Gospel; and this can mean nothing else but the establishment and confirmation of its authority, as the rule of all inward and outward holiness. Whoever, therefore, denies the obligation of the Sabbath on Christians, denies the obligation of the whole Decalogue; and there is no real medium between the acknowledgment of the divine authority of this sacred institution, as a universal law, and that gross corruption of Christianity, generally designated Antinomianism." * We plead the moral obligation of the Sabbath,

3. From the example of the church and people of God in all ages.

That our first parents kept the Sabbath in paradise, is certain; for such was the will of God concerning them; and we know that, for one day at least, they must have perfectly served his pleasure. That they sanctified it, after their fall, and expulsion from paradise, may be confidently inferred, from their penitence, from the Scripture intimations we have of their restoration to the favour of God, as well as from what is said, in Gen. iv. 3, as to the time when Cain and Abel presented their offerings to the Lord. In the text we read, "And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain,"

&c.;

but in the margin it reads, "At the end of days Cain," &c.,-a mode of expression used in other parts of the Old Testament, to denote the expiration of a measured term. As, therefore, one of the earliest, simplest, and most sacred divisions of time was that into weeks, it may be presumed, that these brethren presented their offerings on the day that the Lord had hallowed. This opinion is strengthened, if we suppose, with Dr. Kennicott, that it was then their father invested them

* Watson's Theo. Dict. Article, Sabbath.

with the right of sacrificing; and that this was the first instance in which they offered on God's altar, in their own name, and in behalf of their respective households. Such a service must have been felt to be peculiarly solemn; and, in the ab. sence of all other sacred days, the day which the Lord had blessed, and sanctified by his example, was doubtless chosen for its perform

ance.

That the Sabbath was sanctified by the Patriarchs and their families, may be inferred from the general fidelity with which they served God, and maintained his worship in the world; from the import of those eulogies which God bestowed upon them; (Gen. v. 22—24; vi. 8, 9; vii. 1; xviii. 19; xxvi. 5; 2 Peter ii. 7, 8;) and from the repeated references, in their memoirs, to the division of time into weeks, and the almost worshipful respect which they, and the nations of antiquity, paid to the number seven. The history of the flood demonstrates, that Noah, by God's direction, regulated all his official acts, in connexion with this dreadful catastrophe, by a strict reference to the seventh day. And we ask, What possible reason can be assigned for the studied respect which was thus paid to it, if its sabbatic character be denied? And by what other means could it have been distinguished from the other days of the week, through the lapse of two thousand five hundred years, except by its regular consecration to the worship of God? On this supposition, the problem is satisfactorily explained; but on every other it is utterly inexplicable.

We concede, that the Scriptures do not make express mention of the Sabbath, from the time of its first institution, up to the days of Moses. But if this silence be admitted as evidence that it was forgotten and disregarded, during the whole of this period, we must farther admit, that it was forgotten and disregarded throughout the reign of the Judges, including the administrations of holy Samuel, and of regal Saul; for in all this period (about

six hundred years) it is not once named. Dr. Dwight has proved, that there are only five passages in the Scriptures, in which the Sabbath is mentioned, as distinguished from other holy days, from the time of Moses to the return of the Jews from Babylon, being a period of one thousand years; and he concludes his argument in these words: "Now, let me ask, can any person wonder, that, in an account so summary, as the history of the Patriarchs, there should be no mention of the Sabbath; when it is considered, that, in the space of a thou sand years, during which period the Jews existed both as a nation and a church, with Kings to rule them, and Prophets to teach them, and historians and poets to record and immortalize their wars and religious services, it is mentioned only five times?"

That the Sabbath was sanctified by the Israelites, before the law was given from Sinai, is evident from Exod. xvi. 22-28; where we learn, that on the sixth day after the manna had begun to fall, the people, of their own accord, and in apparent contradiction of the words of Moses, "gathered twice as much bread, two omers for one man," as they had done on the five preceding mornings. Their rulers, doubtful whether they had done right, came to Moses for direction, and he said, "This is that which the Lord hath said, Bake that which ye will bake to-day, and seethe that ye will seethe; and that which remaineth over lay up for you to be kept until the morning. And they laid it up till the morning, as Moses bade": and it did not stink, neither was there any worm therein. And Moses said, Eat that to-day; for to-day is a Sabbath unto the Lord: to-day ye shall not find it in the field. Six days ye shall gather it; but on the seventh day, which is the Sabbath, in it there shall be none." From this history it is manifest, First, That the Sabbath was sanctified by the Israelites at least two months before the law was delivered from Sinai; and that the people prepared for its sanctification

before they received any instructions to that effect from their rulers. Secondly, That Moses vindicated the preparatory arrangements which the people had made, though they were contrary to the literal import of one of his own general instructions; and he did this, not by announcing the law of the Sabbath in form, with the reasons for its sanctification in detail, as if newly revealed; but simply by recognising the fact, that the morrow was a holy Sabbath unto the Lord. Thirdly, That God, instead of punishing them for introducing novelties into his worship, testified his approbation of their conduct by giving them, in continuance, a double portion of manna on the sixth day,by preserving their Sabbath portion sweet, and free from worms,-and by denouncing the attempt to gather it on the Sabbath, as a refusal, on their part, to keep his commandments and laws. Thus, it is plainly proved, that the Sabbath was known and observed before the moral law was promulgated, or the ceremonial existed in its Mosaic form: and this of itself is fatal to the whole of Dr. Paley's argument, as he himself admits. If the divine command was actually delivered at the creation, it was addressed, no doubt, to the whole human species alike; and continues, unless repealed by some subsequent revelation, binding upon all who come to the knowledge of it." And he afterwards adds: "The former opinion" (namely, that the Sabbath was instituted at the creation) "precludes all debate about the extent of the obliga tion." *

That the Jews kept the Sabbath, with more or less strictness, according to the degree of their fidelity, in the service of God, after their settlement in Canaan, is not questioned by any. In the days of their degeneracy, it was indeed extensively violated; but its violation brought down the judgments of God, and the stern rebukes of their Prophets. Their daily sacrifices were doubled on this day, and all

* Moral Philosophy, vol. ii., pp. 77, 78

their annual festivals recognised its permanent sanctity. Nehemiah, and other reformers, laboured to restore it to its original purity; and some of God's richest promises were given on the express condition, that they should turn away their foot from profaning it, and should call it "a delight." In the days of the Redeemer, they were superstitiously exact in everything relating to its outward rest. He called himself "the Lord of the Sabbath; he went, as he was wont, into the synagogue on the Sabbath-day; he taught his disciples to pray, that their flight from the impending destruction of Jerusalem might not be on the Sabbath-day,-implying that, in his estimation, the want of its rest and ordinances would vastly enhance the distress of that day of direst calamity. And though his disciples, after his resurrection, transferred the festival to the first day of the week, (for reasons to be afterwards adduced,) yet they sacredly, and at great risk, consecrated to God a seventh part of their time. Ignatius, a companion of the Apostles Justin Martyr, who lived at the close of the first century; Irenæus, a cotemporary with Polycarp, the disciple of St. John; toge

ther with Tertullian, and all the early Fathers; declare that the Christians kept the Sabbath, but that they kept it on the first day of the week.

Thus, the concurrent testimony of history bears us out, when we say, that exalted piety, whether national or personal, has been invariably cha. racterized by a reverential regard for the sanctity of the Sabbath; and that declension in religion has been as regularly marked by its desecration. If, then, the sovereign appointments of God ought to be reverenced; if his glorious works ought to be commemorated; if his gracious designs ought to be respected; if his promises ought to be valued, and his threatenings feared; if his commandments ought to be obeyed; and if his example, and the example of his incarnate Son, together with that of Patriarchs, Prophets, Apostles, martyrs, and saints, ought to be imitated; then we are bound to keep the Sabbath holy; and we cannot profane it without identifying ourselves with his enemies, trampling his goodness under foot, and setting his authority and his judgments at defiance. PETER M'OWAN.

[blocks in formation]

CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE THE ABIDING WITNESS TO THE TRUTH OF CHRISTIANITY.

(To the Editor of the Wesleyan-Methodist Magazine.)

"If we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of God which he hath testified" (witnessed) "of his Son. He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that

believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record" (witness)" that God gave of his Son. And this is the record," (witness,)" that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God."-1 John v. 9—13.

Ir is necessary that the English reader of the New Testament should

be aware, when he comes to examine this portion of it with the carefulness, and even minute accuracy, which it both requires and deserves, that while our generally excellent translation has three words referring to the main argument of the Apostle, the original has but one. The three words, perhaps, differ more in sound than in ultimate signification; and the translators, probably, employed three words, for the most part similar in meaning, to prevent what they might regard as tautology, or, at all events, a somewhat unpleasant repetition of the same word in what is

« 前へ次へ »