Nomination of John Agresto: Hearings Before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session, on the Nomination of John Agresto to be Archivist of the United States, August 13 and September 9, 10, 1986, 第 4 巻
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987 - 624 ページ
レビュー - レビューを書く
他の版 - すべて表示
additional administration agency Agresto American appointment Archivist asked Assistant Association authority basis believe Chairman Civil Committee concern Congress Constitution continue contract cost Council Court decision Department direct Director discussion documents Education EEOC employees employment equal executive experience facilities fact Federal funds goals going grant groups hearing hiring Humanities important increase independent interest issue John Agresto letter Library matter meeting Michigan million minority National Archives National Endowment nomination Office operations opportunity organization person political position Postal Service preservation President Presidential professional projects proposed qualifications questions race recommendations records request responsibility scholars selection Senator EAGLETON Senator STEVENS serve Society staff statement Street Studies submitted Thank tion understand United University Washington
9 ページ - The Contractor warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee...
5 ページ - As used in this certification, the term "segregated facilities" means any waiting rooms, work areas, rest rooms and wash rooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for employees which are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, color, religion or national origin, because of habit,...
350 ページ - Nothing contained in this title shall be interpreted to require any employer, employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee subject to this title to grant preferential treatment to any individual or to any group because of the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin...
276 ページ - Clarence Mitchell, director of the Washington Bureau of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
160 ページ - As there is a degree of depravity in mankind which requires a certain degree of circumspection and distrust: So there are other qualities in human nature, which justify a certain portion of esteem and confidence.
351 ページ - The guarantee of equal protection cannot mean one thing when applied to one individual and something else when applied to a person of another color. If both are not accorded the same protection, then it is not equal.
9 ページ - ... an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. excepting bona fide employees or bona fide' established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the Contractor for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty the Government shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or In Its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage,...
352 ページ - We have never approved a classification that aids persons perceived as members of relatively victimized groups at the expense of other innocent individuals in the absence of judicial, legislative, or administrative findings of constitutional or statutory violations.
458 ページ - The President The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: To the Vice President: The Vice President The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr.
351 ページ - It should be noted, to begin with, that all legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are immediately suspect. That is not to say that all such restrictions are unconstitutional. It is to say that courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.