SECT. VIII. That Cogitation cannot be fu-
peradded to Matter, p. 45. This can be done but
three Ways, either ift, by Motion, 2dly, by Ge-
neration, 3dly, by Omnipotence, p. 46. If, Not
by Motion, from the Effects produc'd in a Body
mov'd, p. 47. Which are all reducible to this one,
Change of Place, p.48. Impoffible for a Body to think
because in one Place, and not in another, p. 49.
2dly, Not by Generation, ibid. Real Qualities
abfurd, p. 50. All refulting from Motion, ibid.
Difference of their Idea from that of Motion ac-
counted for, p. 51. Relative Qualities can neither
produce, nor continue Thought, p. 52. 3dly, The
laft Objection taken from Omnipotence propos'd,
ibid. This no cover for an Atheist, yet an Appara-
tus to Atheism as making a Corporeal Deity pof-
fible, and difabling Mr. L's own Arguments to the
contrary, p. 53. Thought cannot be one of the,
to us unknown Properties, which Omnipotence bas
beftow'd on Matter as fuch, p. 57. Another Senfe
of the Objection propos'd, that there may be fome,
to us unknown, Capacity of Thought in Matter, fo
that Omnipotence may conferr it on fome Corpore-
al Syftems, p. 58. The Objection refolv'd into
three Particulars, ibid. In what Senfe it is af
ferted that Omnipotence cannot create Cogitative
Matter, p. 59. The 1ft. Ground of the Objection,
that a Capacity of Thought may be one of the many,
to us unknown Properties of Matter propos'd, p.
60. In answer, confider'd upon what Accounts we
can at any time exclude a Property from belonging
to a Subftance, p. 61. fhewn to take place here, p.
62. The 2d. Ground of the Objection that this Ca-
pacity may be in Matter, tho' it is not included in
our Idea of it, anfwer'd, p. 63. Mr. L's unfair