 | Jeremy Bentham - 1843 - 616 ページ
...of Wales, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the Lord High Chancellor, to be passing by in the same coach, while a chimney-sweeper and a barrow-woman...certain, that if a great man who sues or is sued does not attend the judge, he must attend an attorney. Of the two attendances, which is most humiliating... | |
 | Jeremy Bentham - 1843 - 614 ページ
...of Wales, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the Lord High Chancellor, to be passing by in the same coach, while a chimney-sweeper and a barrow-woman...certainly. Of the two hardships, then, which is the greatest—to attend upon other people's business, or your own? One thing is certain, that if a great... | |
 | Indiana State Medical Association, Indiana State Medical Society - 1878 - 216 ページ
...chimney-sweeper and barrow-woman were in dispute about a half-penny worth of apples, and the chimney-sweeper and the barrowwoman were to think proper to call upon...evidence, could they refuse it? No! most certainly not."' . Nothing is said in this work in relation to the exemption of physicians or other men of science.... | |
 | Indiana State Medical Society - 1878 - 216 ページ
...chimney-sweeper and barrow-woman were in dispute about a half-penny worth of apples, and the chimney-sweeper and the barrowwoman were to think proper to call upon...evidence, could they refuse it? No! most certainly not.'" Nothing is said in this work in relation to the exemption of physicians or other men of science.... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1879 - 888 ページ
...and a barrow-woman were in dispute about a half-penny worth of apples, and the chimney-sweeper and the barrow-woman were to think proper to call upon...evidence, could they refuse it ? No! most certainly not. '" Nothing is said in this work in relation to the exemption of physicians or other men of science.... | |
 | 1880 - 920 ページ
...dispute about a half-penny-worth of apples, and the chimney-sweeper and the barrow-woman were to see fit to call upon them for their evidence, could they refuse it? No! most certainly not." Neither of these quotations militates against the position that a professional man is exempt... | |
 | John Davison Lawson - 1883 - 686 ページ
...were in dispute about a half -penny worth of apples, and the chimney-sweeper and the barrow- woman were to think proper to call upon them for their evidence, could they refuse it? No! most certainly not.' " Nothing is said m this work in relation to the exemption of physicians or other men of science.... | |
 | 1898 - 926 ページ
...dispute about a halfpenny worth of apples, and the chimney sweeper and the barrow woman were to see proper to call upon them for their evidence, •could they refuse it? No! most certainly not!" Ex piirtf Dement, 53 Ala. 390. 25 Am. Rep. 611. It follows that in this case the court could... | |
 | John Henry Wigmore - 1905 - 922 ページ
...of Wales, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the Lord High Chancellor, to be passing by in the same coach while a chimney-sweeper and a barrow-woman were...evidence, could they refuse it? No, most certainly." 1861, Willes, J., in Ex parie Fernandez, 10 CBN 8. 3, 39 : " Every person in the kiugdom, except the... | |
 | 1907 - 1332 ページ
...woman were in dispute about a half-penny worth of apples, and the chimney sweeper or the barrow woman were to think proper to call upon them for their evidence, could they refuse it? "No I Most certainly not" Every one (Including the expert) would yield ready assent to that statement The... | |
| |
Were the Prince of Wales, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the Lord High Chancellor, to be passing by in the same coach, while a chimney-sweeper and a barrow-woman were in dispute about a halfpennyworth of apples, and the chimney-sweeper or the barrow-woman... 
