The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of EvilOxford University Press, 2005 - 284 ページ What distinguishes evils from ordinary wrongs? Is hatred a necessarily evil? Are some evils unforgivable? Are there evils we should tolerate? What can make evils hard to recognize? Are evils inevitable? How can we best respond to and live with evils? Claudia Card offers a secular theory of evil that responds to these questions and more. Evils, according to her theory, have two fundamental components. One component is reasonably foreseeable intolerable harm -- harm that makes a life indecent and impossible or that makes a death indecent. The other component is culpable wrongdoing. Atrocities, such as genocides, slavery, war rape, torture, and severe child abuse, are Card's paradigms because in them these key elements are writ large. Atrocities deserve more attention than secular philosophers have so far paid them. They are distinguished from ordinary wrongs not by the psychological states of evildoers but by the seriousness of the harm that is done. Evildoers need not be sadistic: they may simply be negligent or unscrupulous in pursuing their goals. Card's theory represents a compromise between classic utilitarian and stoic alternatives (including Kant's theory of radical evil). Utilitarians tend to reduce evils to their harms; Stoics tend to reduce evils to the wickedness of perpetrators: Card accepts neither reduction. She also responds to Nietzsche's challenges about the worth of the concept of evil, and she uses her theory to argue that evils are more important than merely unjust inequalities. She applies the theory in explorations of war rape and violence against intimates. She also takes up what Primo Levi called "the gray zone", where victims become complicit in perpetrating on others evils that threaten to engulf themselves. While most past accounts of evil have focused on perpetrators, Card begins instead from the position of the victims, but then considers more generally how to respond to -- and live with -- evils, as victims, as perpetrators, and as those who have become both. |
この書籍内から
検索結果1-5 / 73
3 ページ
このページの内容は閲覧が制限されています.
このページの内容は閲覧が制限されています.
4 ページ
このページの内容は閲覧が制限されています.
このページの内容は閲覧が制限されています.
5 ページ
このページの内容は閲覧が制限されています.
このページの内容は閲覧が制限されています.
7 ページ
このページの内容は閲覧が制限されています.
このページの内容は閲覧が制限されています.
10 ページ
このページの内容は閲覧が制限されています.
このページの内容は閲覧が制限されています.
他の版 - すべて表示
多く使われている語句
abuse argues atrocity paradigm basic better Cambridge Categorical Imperative chapter choices comfort women concept of evil crimes culpable wrongdoing death deeds diabolical evil Essays ethics evildoers example feminism feminist forgiveness Genealogy Genealogy of Morality gratitude gray zone guilt hatred hostility human identify inequalities inflicted intolerable harm John Rawls judgments of evil justice Kant Kant's Karl's lesbian less lives marriage Martha Nussbaum Mary Daly mercy misogyny moral motherhood mothers motives murder Nietzsche Nietzsche's Nussbaum obligation offender one's oppression Patricia Hearst penalty perpetrators perspectives philosophers practices principle prioritize prisoners punishment question radical evil rape Rawls Rawls's regarding relationships resentment response same-sex same-sex marriage seems sense sexual sexual slavery simply slavery slaves social Sonderkommando spouses Stockholm Syndrome stoic stoicism suffering survivors terrorism theory of evil Theory of Justice things tion torture trans University Press utilitarian values victims violence Wiesenthal Wiesenthal's women wrong York