| Alan A. Stone - 1985 - 300 ページ
...protect the intended victim arises whenever a therapist determines, or pursuant to the standards of the profession should determine, that his patient presents a serious danger of violence to another."33 The determination of liability hinges upon whether the third party victims were "readily... | |
| Leonard Jason - 1987 - 330 ページ
...potential victims of his or her patients: When a therapist determines or pursuant to the standards of his profession should determine that his patient...to protect the intended victim against such danger, (p. 334) The exercise of such "reasonable care," the Court concluded, might include but would not necessarily... | |
| Jeffrey M. Seibert, Roberta Ann Olson - 1989 - 264 ページ
...or should have determined, that a client presents a serious danger of violence to another, he or she incurs an obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim against such danger. Discharge of this duty, the court noted, might include warning the intended victim or calling the police.... | |
| Herman Meïr Praag, Robert Plutchik, Alan Apter - 1990 - 354 ページ
...the California Supreme Court stated that, "When a therapist determines, or pursuant to the standards of his profession should determine, that his patient...incurs an obligation to use reasonable care to protect [emphasis added] the intended victim against such danger (Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California,... | |
| Frederic G. Reamer - 1991 - 344 ページ
...therapist determines that a patient presents a serious danger of violence to another, the physician incurs an obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim against such danger. According to the court, this may require the physician or therapist to warn the intended victim or... | |
| Yale AIDS Law Project Staff - 1993 - 468 ページ
...employer, the state of California. The supreme court noted that once "a therapist determines . . . that his patient presents a serious danger of violence...intended victim against such danger. The discharge of this duty . . . may call for him to warn the intended victim."83 Although the Tarasoff decision has... | |
| James F. Drane - 1994 - 262 ページ
...notify her of her peril. The court explained: When a therapist determines, or pursuant to the standards of his profession should determine, that his patient...intended victim against such danger. The discharge of this duty may require the therapist to take one or more various steps, depending upon the nature of... | |
| Paul S. Appelbaum - 1994 - 260 ページ
...obligation to protect intended victims "[w]hen a therapist determines, or pursuant to the standards of his profession should determine, that his patient presents a serious danger of violence to another . . ." (p. 340). It seems clear that the professions were already willing to act when they believed... | |
| Robert M. Veatch - 1997 - 482 ページ
...and psychologist had a duty to warn her. "When a therapist determines, or pursuant to the standards of his profession should determine, that his patient...to protect the intended victim against such danger" such as warning the intended victim, notifying the police or "Whatever other steps are reasonably necessary... | |
| Howard H. Kaufman, Jeff L. Lewin - 1997 - 272 ページ
...[WJhen a therapist determines, or pursuant to the standards of his profession should have determined, that his patient presents a serious danger of violence...victim against such danger. . . .[The discharge of this duty] may call for [the therapist] to warn the intended victim of the danger, to notify the police,... | |
| |