レビュー - レビューを書く
他の版 - すべて表示
act of assembly action admitted affirmed Algesiras appear applied April assignment bill of exceptions Binn blockade bond BRAcKENRIDGE cargo cause certiorari charge claim common law Common Pleas Commonwealth contended contract contribution conveyance counsel Court of Common creditors debts decided declaration deed defendant defendant's delivered dollars ejectment entered entitled execution executors fact favour fendant Gass Huntingdon county indictment intention issue Judge judgment jury justice land lessee levy March ment monwealth novo awarded objection opinion paid party payment Penn township Pennsylvania person Philadelphia plaintiff in error port possession proceedings proved Quarter Sessions question reason record Rhoads and Perit Richard Peters rule scire facias sheriff shew shewn ship Smith sold suit supercargo survey taken testator TILGHMAN C. J. tion township trial venire facias verdict vessel warrant Westmoreland county whole wife William William Gass witness writ of error YEATEs
307 ページ - That nothing herein contained shall be construed to apply to or affect the provisions of the " act respecting fugitives from justice, and persons escaping from the service of their masters...
92 ページ - ... representing a man in an obscene, impudent and indecent posture with a woman, to the manifest corruption and subversion of youth, and other citizens of this commonwealth, to the evil example of all others in like case offending, and against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
215 ページ - ... agree to put an end to all doubts on the law and the fact, on the defendants' engaging to pay a stipulated sum. I am of opinion that this case is distinguishable from those cited in argument, inasmuch as in this case the law was doubtful, and the parties agreed to waive all questions of law and fact. I am therefore of opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover.
571 ページ - But a mere intruder cannot enter on a person actually seized and eject him, and then question his title or set up an outstanding title in another. The maxim that the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's, is applicable to all actions for the recovery of property. But if the plaintiff had actual prior possession of the land, this is strong enough to enable him to recover it from a mere trespasser who entered without any title.
335 ページ - States shall be first satisfied, and the priority hereby established shall extend as well to cases in which a debtor, not having sufficient property to pay all his debts, makes a voluntary assignment thereof, or in which the estate and effects of an absconding, concealed, or absent debtor are attached by process of law, as to cases in which an act of bankruptcy is committed.
271 ページ - State one year, and in the election district where he offers to vote ten days immediately preceding such election, and within two years paid a State or county tax, which shall have been assessed at least ten days before the election, shall enjoy the rights of an elector.
77 ページ - And, for the protection of persons acting in the execution of this act, be it enacted, that all actions and prosecutions to be commenced against any person for any thing done in pursuance of this act shall be laid and tried in the county where the fact was committed, and shall be commenced within six calendar months after the fact committed, and not...
33 ページ - The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of the invaluable rights of man ; and every citizen may freely speak, write and print on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty.
307 ページ - ... all servitude for life, or slavery of children, in consequence of the slavery of their mothers, in the case of all children born within this State from and after the passing of this act as aforesaid, shall be, and hereby is, utterly taken away, extinguished, and for ever abolished.
102 ページ - What tended to corrupt society was held to be a breach of the peace, and punishable by indictment. The courts are guardians of the public morals, and therefore have jurisdiction in such cases. Hence it follows that an offense may be punishable, if in its nature and by its example it tends to the corruption of morals, although it be not committed in public.