His blue eye glistening cold and bright, "Fair Lords," he said, "Our Lady's love, But what means this? no peace is here!— Do dirks unsheathed suit bridal cheer? Or Or are these naked brands A seemly show for Churchman's sight, XXIV. Then, cloaking hate with fiery zeal, Of Pope and Church, for murder done Yet well I grant, to end debate, XXV. Then Ronald pled the stranger's cause, Brought pray'rs and tears to back the plea: And Edith lent her generous aid, And wept, and Lorn for mercy pray'd. XXVI. Then Argentine, in England's name, 1It was anciently customary in the Highlands to bring the bride to the house of the husband. Nay, in some cases the complaisance was stretched so far, that she remained there upon trial for a twelvemonth; and the bridegroom, even after this period of cohabitation, retained an option of refusing to fulfil his engagement. It is said that a desperate feud ensued between the clans of Mac-Donald of Sleate and Mac-Leod, owing to the former chief having availed himself of this license to send back to Dunvegan a sister, or daughter of the latter. Mac-Leod, resenting the indignity, observed, that since there was no wedding bonfire, there should be one to solemnize the divorce. Accordingly, he burned and laid waste the territories of MacDonald, who retaliated, and a deadly feud, with all its accompaniments, took place in form. And now, as from the flint the fire, 66 "By English Edward had been shed, 'Stow gives the following curious account of the trial and execution of this celebrated patriot: — "William Wallace, who had oft-times set Scotland in great trouble, was taken and brought to London, with great numbers of men and women wondering upon him. He was lodged in the house of William Delect, a citizen of London, in Fenchurch-street. On the morrow, being the eve of St. Bartholomew, he was brought on horseback to Westminster. John Legrave and Geffrey, knights, the mayor, sheriffs, and aldermen of London, and many others, both on horseback and on foot, accompanying him; and in the great hall at Westminster, he being placed on the south bench, crowned with laurel, for that he had said in times past that he ought to bear a crown in that hall, as it was commonly reported; and being appeached for a traitor by Sir Peter Malorie, the king's justice, he answered, that he was never traitor to the King of England; but for other things whereof he was accused he confessed them; and was after headed and quartered."-Sтow, Chr. p. 209. There is something singularly doubtful about the mode in which Wallace was taken. That he was betrayed to the English is indubitable; and popular fame charges Sir John Menteith with the indelible infamy. "Accursed," says Arnold Blair, "be the day of nativity of John de Menteith, and may his name be struck out of the book of life." But John de Menteith was all along a zealous favourer of the English interest, and was governor of Dumbarton Castle by commission from Edward the First; and therefore, as the accurate Lord Hailes has observed, could not be the friend and confidant of Wallace, as tradition states him to be. The truth seems to be, that Menteith, thoroughly engaged in the English interest, pursued Wallace closely, and made him prisoner through the treachery of an attendant, whom Peter Langtoft calls Jack Short. And done to death by felon hand, Where Somerville, the kind and free? "William Waleis is nomen that master was of theves, Sir John of Menetest sued William so nigh, He tok him when he ween'd least, on night, his leman him by, He was the encheson that Sir John so him ran, Jack's brother had he slain, the Walleis that is said, From this it would appear that the infamy of seizing Wallace, must rest between a degenerate Scottish nobleman, the vassal of England, and a domestic, the obscure agent of his treachery; between Sir John Menteith, son of Walter, Earl of Menteith, and the traitor Jack Short. 'John de Strathbogie, Earl of Athole, had attempted to escape out of the kingdom, but a storm cast him upon the coast, when he was taken, sent to London, and executed, with circumstances of great barbarity, being first half strangled, then let down from the gallows while yet alive, barbarously dismembered, and his body burnt. It may surprise the reader to learn, that this was a mitigated punishment; for in respect that his mother was a grand-daughter of King John, by his natural son Richard, he was not drawn on a sledge to execution, "that point was for And must his word, till dying day, Be nought but quarter, hang, and slay! given," and he made the passage on horseback. Matthew of Westminster tells us that King Edward, then extremely ill, received great ease from the news that his relative was apprehended. "Quo audito, Rex Angliæ, etsi gravissimo morbo tunc langueret, levius tamen tulit dolorem." To this singular expression the text alludes. 'This alludes to a passage in Barbour, singularly expressive of the vindictive spirit of Edward I. The prisoners taken at the castle of Kildrummie had surrendered upon condition that they should be at King Edward's disposal. "But his will," says Barbour, "was always evil towards Scottishmen." The news of the surrender of Kildrummie arrived when he was in his mortal sickness at Burgh-upon-Sands. "And when he to the death was near, Come with prisoners that they had tane, He said, grinning, 'HANGS AND DRAWS.' That he, that to the death was near, That sooth-fastly dooms all thing To have mercy for his crying, Off him that, throw his felony, Into sic point had no mercy?" There was much truth in the Leonine couplet, with which Mat. thew of Westminster concludes his encomium on the first Edward: "Scotos Edwardus, dum vixit, suppeditavit, W VOL. V. 7 |