ページの画像
PDF
ePub

1

disclaim all knowledge of the Expedition to Egypt---
Their perfidy and duplicity exposed in their commu-
nications with the Porte--- Contradiction between their
declarations and those of Ruffin, their Ambassador, at
Constantinople---Ruffin produces a Letter, avowing the
object of the Expedition to Egypt to be the punishment
of the Beys for injuries committed on Frenchmen---
Talleyrand denies this to the Turkish Ambassador, at
Paris, and declares the conquest of Malta to be the sole
object of the Expedition --- Falsehoods contained in the
French Manifesto proved by the intercepted letters from
the French army in Egypt--- The Military' conscription
extended to the conquered countries---Partial insurrections
in the Netherlands---Insolence of Garat, the French Envoy
at Naples---Demands the release of all Traitors, imprisoned
for their crimes---The King of Naples prepares for war---
Enters the Roman Territory--- Is defeated at Porto
Fornio--- Concludes an armistice with the French---
Leaves his Capital, and retires to Sicily--- Popular tumults
excited by the French at Naples---A revolution effected
on French principles--- The Neapolitan Republic pro-
claimed--- Meeting of Parliament---The King's Speech---.
Thanks voted to Nelson and his followers---The Admiral
is created BARON NELSON OF THE NILE--- Committee
of Supply--- Mr. Pitt details the expences of the coming
year, and the means of providing for them---Flourishing
state of Commerce--- Large increase of Exports and
Imports---Mr. Pitt adverts to the frauds which had been
practised to defeat the project of the Triple Assessment---
Proposes a new scheme of Finance--- The Tax upon
Income--- Measures proposed for rendering it effective---
Powers of Commissioners under the Act--- Reflections on
the multiplication of Oaths occasioned by the Revenue
Laws--- Estimated amount of the Tax, ten millions---
Grounds of that Estimate.-- Advantages of raising a large

portion of the Supplies within the year--- The energy of
the Parliament the cause of National prosperity--- Mr.
Pitt confutes the notion that a Commercial people cannot
be a Warlike people--- Pronounces an eulogy on the
British Constitution--- Mr. Tierney opposes the Tax---
Resolutions proposed by Mr. Pitt carried without a divi-
sion--- Remarks on the unequal operation of the Tax
upon Income---Farther debates on the subject---The Bill
opposed by Sir John Sinclair, Sir Francis Baring, and
Mr. William Smith---The fallacy of Sir John Sinclair's
arguments exposed--- Mr. Pitt justifies the Tax---Com-
ments on the inconsistency of Mr. Smith in admitting
the justice of the principle, and opposing every mea-
sure for carrying it into effect---Corrects his mistatements
on the distinctions of society---Reprobates all new-fangled
notions respecting Equality--- Proves Mr. Smith's argu-
ments to extend to an equal distribution of property---
Defends the Bill from the imputation of establishing a
Tithe Explains the difference between Tithe and the
contribution of a Tenth part of Income to be levied by the
Act---Argument examined relative to the different effects
of the Tax on permanent and on temporary estates---
The Bill passes the Commons--- Is opposed in the Lords
by the Duke of Bedford, and Lords Suffolk and Holland---
Manly conduct of Lord Grenville---Mistaken position of
Lord Holland--- Assertion of the Duke of Bedford
respecting Tithes contradicted by the Chancellor--- Bill
passed into a Law Farther Supplies---New Taxes---
Subsidy to Russia---Opposed by Mr. Tierney---Mr. Pitt
repels the conclusions drawn by Mr. Tierney regarding
the object of the war, and the intentions of the Cabinet---
Reflections on the evil tendency of the writings of the
French Economists and Philosophists---The inconsistency
of Mr. Tierney's arguments detected, and the confusion
of his ideas exposed, by Mr. Pitt---Mr. Pitt draws a just

character of the French Republic---Seditious Societies---
Papers respecting them referred to a Secret Committee---
Report of that Committee---It unfolds a complicated scene
of sedition and treason---Plan, and object, of the Societies,
to establish a Democratic Republic in Great Britain with
the assistance of France---Their Address to the French
Directory---The London Corresponding Society abandon
the project of annual Parliaments, and universal suffrage,
for still more Revolutionary schemes---United Irishmen
form Societies in England---Administer unlawful Oaths---
Many of them enter the Naval service---Plans for mur-
dering their officers, and for carrying their ships into an
enemy's port---Swear to murder the Protestants---Plan for
exciting an insurrection in London--- and for seizing,
at the same moment, the two Houses of Parliament,
the Tower, and the Bank---Mr. Pitt introduces two Bills,
one for renewing the Bill to enable the King to detain
persons suspected of Treason, and another for the sup-
pression of Seditious Societies---Proposes to empower the
King to imprison such persons in any one of his Gaols---
Members of Secret Societies rendered liable to fine,
imprisonment, or transportation, according to the nature
of their offence--- Proprietors of houses at which such
Societies are held subjected to a fine---All lectures and
discussions at which money is taken for admission pro-
hibited--- Printers compelled to affix their names to hand-
bills---All presses to be registered---These Bills passed
into Laws.

Irish affairs-State of Ireland, from her first connection with

England to the rebellion of 1798-Efforts of the Catholics

to produce a separation of the two countries-The Catholic

Priests exhort their flocks, previous to the rebellion in

1641, not to give their votes to Protestant candidates—

Imperfect state of the representation in Ireland-Abuse of

the elective franchise by the Catholics-Their conduct,

the natural result of their religious principles-An union of

Great Britain and Ireland projected by Mr. Pitt—The

King's message to Parliament, on the subject-Debate on

the message-Address moved by Mr. Dundas-Opposed

by Mr. Sheridan-He ascribes the evils prevalent in

Ireland to the ignorance and poverty of the people

-Denies the competency of Parliament to conclude

an union-Moves an amendment-Address supported

by Mr. Canning-Mr.Pitt's speech-Censures Mr.Sheridan's

doctrine as leading to jacobinism-Asserts the competence

of Parliament - Contrasts the former statements of

Opposition, relative to the defects in the Irish Constitu-

tion, with their present eulogies on the same system

-Shews the settlement of 1782 not to have been

final-Displays the advantages of an union to both

countries-Proves its necessity, from the evils arising

from the present state of parties in Ireland-In-

stances the case of the Regency, to prove that a diffe-

rence on points of primary importance might subsist between

the two separate Parliaments-Mr. Sheridan's amendment

rejected, and the address adopted-Public discussions of

the same subject in Ireland-Great ferment occasioned by

it in that country-Tract in favour of the Union, by Mr.

Edward Cooke-Meeting of the Irish Bar-They decide

against the Union-Resolution of the Corporation of

Dublin against the Union-The bankers and merchants

of Dublin pass similar resolutions-Meeting of the Irish

Parliament-The Viceroy's speech-Address carried in the

House of Lords without a division-Majority of one only in

favour of the address in the Commons-Lord Castlereagh

condemns the rejection of the plan without examination—

The address rejected, on the report, by a majority of five

-The members who voted with the minister are insulted

by the populace-Mr. Pitt unfolds his plan of an Union to

the British House of Commons-Expresses a hope that the

measure will be ultimately carried-Takes a comprehen-

sive view of the question in all its bearings-Supports his

own sentiments by those of Mr. Foster, on the question of

the commercial propositions-Proves Mr. Foster's former

opinion to be directly opposite to his present opinion-Con-

siders the measure as necessary for the security of Ireland

-Takes a view of the religious disputes in Ireland-Con-

siders all questions relating to the Catholic claims as more

likely to be impartially discussed in an united, than in

a separate, legislature-Remark upon Mr. Pitt's notion,

respecting tithes, in Ireland-Commercial benefits to be

derived by Ireland from the Union-Ireland indebted to

the liberality of the British Parliament for her present

advantages in trade-Mr. Pitt confutes the objections of

Mr. Sheridan and others, who oppose the Union-

Exposes the folly and dangerous tendency of the asserted

principle of the sovereignty of the people-Shews the

independence of Ireland not to be affected by the Union

-Adduces the instance of the advantages resulting to the

Scotch from their Union with England, in proof of the

benefits to be expected from a similar measure by Ireland

-Proposes eight resolutions, as the ground-work of an

Union-Mr. Sheridan opposes them-He compliments

Mr. Pitt as an orator, but condemns him as a statesman-

Moves an amendment, which is rejected by 140 votes

« 前へ次へ »