Collective Choice and Social WelfareElsevier, 2014/07/24 - 236 ページ This book is concerned with the study of collective preference, in particular with the relationship between the objectives of social action and the preferences and aspirations of society's members. Professor Sen's approach is based on the assumption that the problem of collective choice cannot be satisfactorily discussed within the confines of economics. While collective choice forms a crucial aspect of economics, the subject pertains also to political science, the theory of the state, and to the theory of decision procedures. The author has therefore used material from these disciplines, plus philosophical aspects from ethics and the theory of justice. |
目次
| 1 | |
| 7 | |
Chapter 2 UNANIMITY | 21 |
Chapter 2 COLLECTIVE CHOICE RULES ANDPARETO COMPARISONS | 28 |
Chapter 3 COLLECTIVE RATIONALITY | 33 |
Chapter 3 SOCIAL WELFARE FUNCTIONS | 41 |
Chapter 4 CHOICE VERSUS ORDERINGS | 47 |
Chapter 4 SOCIAL DECISION FUNCTIONS | 52 |
Chapter 7 AGGREGATION QUASIORDERINGS1 | 105 |
Chapter 8 CARDINALITY WITH OR WITHOUT COMPARABILITY | 118 |
Chapter 8 BARGAINS AND SOCIAL WELFAREFUNCTIONALS | 126 |
Chapter 9 EQUITY AND JUSTICE | 131 |
Chapter 9 IMPERSONALITY AND COLLECTIVE QUASIORDERINGS | 152 |
Chapter 10 MAJORITY CHOICE AND RELATED SYSTEMS | 161 |
Chapter 10 RESTRICTED PREFERENCES AND RATIONAL CHOICE | 173 |
Chapter 11 THEORY AND PRACTICE | 187 |
Chapter 5 VALUES AND CHOICE | 56 |
Chapter 5 ANONYMITY NEUTRALITY AND RESPONSIVENESS | 71 |
Chapter 6 CONFLICTS AND DILEMMAS | 78 |
Chapter 6 THE LIBERAL PARADOX | 87 |
Chapter 7 INTERPERSONAL AGGREGATION AND COMPARABILITY | 89 |
| 201 | |
| 221 | |
| 223 | |
他の版 - すべて表示
多く使われている語句
aggregation alternatives appealing approach Arrow assume assumption axiom called cardinal Chapter choice function collective choice collective choice rule comparability complete concerned condition Consider corresponding course criterion decision defined DEFINITION depend discussed economics element ethical example existence fact factual Further given Hence holds implies important impossibility independence indifferent individual orderings individual preferences individual welfare interesting interpersonal involved irrelevant justice least Lemma logically majority matter maximal measures merely method necessary noted ordering pair Pareto Pareto principle partial particular person positive possible preference relation principle probability problem proof quasi-ordering question relation relevant require respectively restriction result satisfy seems sense set of individual similar social choice social preference society specified strict sufficient Theorem tion transitivity triple units utility value judgments violates voting weak welfare welfare function yield