Social RegulationTransaction Publishers |
目次
Assessing and Controlling Risks | 21 |
Implementing the Bubble Policy | 59 |
Virtue Revisited | 93 |
Tailoring Government Response to Diversity | 119 |
Developing Successful Enforcement Programs | 139 |
7 | 159 |
Branch Regulation | 177 |
Private Bargaining and Public Regulation | 201 |
Promoting Safety through Insurance | 267 |
SelfRegulation and Regulatory Paperwork | 315 |
Responsibility and Accountability | 343 |
The Yuletide Regulatory Reform | 361 |
NOTES | 379 |
391 | |
ABOUT THE AUTHORS | 403 |
PUBLICATIONS LIST | 415 |
他の版 - すべて表示
多く使われている語句
accident Administration air pollution air quality animal animal tests approval areas bargaining benefits bubble cancer carcinogenic chemicals Clean Air Act communitarian companies compliance Congress consumer costs decisions Delaney clause develop direct regulation drug economic effective emissions enforcement environmental epidemiology example exposure Federal Register firms food additives hazards health and safety implementation imposed improve incentives increase industry inspection inspectors Institute issues liability law liability system limited manufacturers ment MICHAEL O'HARE monitor NHTSA nitrosamine Office OIRA operations OSHA paperwork permits plants political pollution potential practices problems procedures product liability proposed protective Publication date quality control RARG reason reduce regulatory agencies regulatory program regulatory reform requirements responsibility result risk assessment rules saccharin social standards strategy substances tests tion tional tive TOSCA toxic ulation ulatory union vehicle workers workplace
人気のある引用
4 ページ - Federal agencies that develop regulations for toxic substances include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
5 ページ - Perhaps understandably, in the late 1970s and early 1980s "regulatory reform" has taken on an entirely different meaning than it had in the 1960s and early 1970s. Today's reform usually implies moderating the "excesses," the "overregulation" attributed to the effectiveness-enhancing regulatory reforms of the 1960s and 1970s. The regulatory pendulum, it is argued, has swung too far, has reached a point of diminishing (or negative) returns, and must be pushed back a bit, at least until the economy...