that where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action upon it. Cases in Bankruptcy - 14 ページJohn William Buck, John Scott Earl of Eldon, Sir Thomas Plumer, Sir John Leach, Great Britain. Court of Chancery 著 - 1820 - 694 ページ全文表示 - この書籍について
| 1883 - 812 ページ
...of Rchemerhorn vs. VanderJieyden, 1 John*. Rep. 13!), the Court say, "we are of opinion that where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action on such promise. This was the doctrine of the King's... | |
| Isaac Grant Thompson - 1883 - 958 ページ
...into his hands. To the same effect is Stevens v. Casbacker, 8 Hun, 116. It has also been held, where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, the person to whom the promise is made may execute a valid release of such promise before it... | |
| Isaac Grant Thompson - 1884 - 1000 ページ
...inharmonious reasons to sustain them. Some of the cases seem to proceed " upon the broad principle that if one person makes a promise to another, for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action on the promise; " and that without regard to the question... | |
| New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1884 - 798 ページ
...be recovered on an implied liability. (McDonald v. Mayor, 68 NY 23; Laws of 1878, chap. 315.) When one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action upon it. (Schermerhorn v. Vandcrheyden, 1 Johns. 140... | |
| 1919 - 1022 ページ
...Рас. 23. It Is said In 13 CJ 705, § 815: "In most of the states the English doctrine that where a person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person the latter cannot maintain an action on it is 'not recognized to the full extent, but it is... | |
| Charles Hastings Wiltsie - 1885 - 364 ページ
...which his debtor has obtained to reenforce the primary obligation ;:: and second, the th aory that if one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action on the promise.4 The first of these is as old as English... | |
| 1915 - 1128 ページ
...to the contract has long been disregarded. "In most of the states the English doctrine that, where a person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, the latter cannot maintain an action upon it is not recognized to the full extent, but it is... | |
| 1888 - 940 ページ
...that an action at law might be maintained on it; for it is settled that, in cases of simple contract, if one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third, the third may maintain an action at law on it, though the consideration does not move from him. It... | |
| Charles Theodore Boone - 1884 - 598 ページ
...mortgagee may recover in aesumpsit.3 The liability incurred is placed upon the broad principle that if one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, the latter may maintain an action on euch promise.4 In other words, if A. conveys land to В.,... | |
| 1889 - 1132 ページ
...according to the intention of the parties. The rule is otherwise in respect to simple contracts. There, if one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third, the third may maintain an action on it in his own name. Joslin v. CarSpring Co., 36 NJ Law, 141. It... | |
| |