 that where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action upon it.  Cases in Bankruptcy - 14 ページJohn William Buck, John Scott Earl of Eldon, Sir Thomas Plumer, Sir John Leach, Great Britain. Court of Chancery 著 - 1820 - 694 ページ全文表示 - この書籍について
 | Eugene Allen Gilmore, William Charles Wermuth - 1917 - 970 ページ
...Supreme Court of this State, upon what was then regarded as the settled law of England, "that where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action upon it." Schermerhorn v. Vanderheyden, 1 John. R.... | |
 | George Purcell Costigan - 1921 - 1544 ページ
...Supreme Court of this state, upon what was then regarded as the settled law of England, "that where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action upon it." Schermerhorn v. Vanderheyden, (1 John. R.... | |
 | University of Minnesota. Law School - 1921 - 362 ページ
...to enforce the promise? In some of the text books and decisions it is stated generally "that, where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action upon it." But we do not think there is a case to be... | |
 | William Everett Britton, Ralph Stanley Bauer - 1922 - 1612 ページ
...inharmonious reasons to sustain them. Some of the cases seem to proceed "upon the broac] principle that if one person makes a promise to another, for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action on the promise;" and that without regard to the question... | |
 | Samuel Williston - 1922 - 1092 ページ
...Supreme Court of this Statej jrnonjynat was theTTregarded as the settled law of England, "that where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third persoju-jhat third person may maintain an action upon it." Schermerhorn v. Vanderheyden, 1 John. R.... | |
 | Briscoe Baldwin Clark - 1922 - 1270 ページ
...consideration moving from him, on what was then regarded as the settled law of England, " that where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action on such promise."92 It is not necessary in an action... | |
 | Alfred William Bays - 1923 - 1612 ページ
...J.: "* * * As early as 1806, it was announced by the Supreme Court of this state * * * 'That where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action on it.' " Question 162: What was the agreement in... | |
 | Oliver Albert Harker - 1924 - 490 ページ
...insists, that the case is within a rule which creates an exception to the foregoing principles, that where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third, the latter is the proper party to maintain an action upon it; and therefore claims that the legatees,... | |
 | Ernest Wilson Huffcut, Edwin Hamlin Woodruff - 1925 - 872 ページ
...Supreme Court of this state, upon what was then regarded as the settled law of England, '' that where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action upon it." Schemerhorn v. Vanderheyden (1 John. R.... | |
 | Charles Hastings Wiltsie - 1927 - 970 ページ
...securities which his debtor has obtained to reinforce the primary obligation;50 and second, the theory that if one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action on the promise.51 The first of these is as old as... | |
| |
